Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Schrödinger’s Fetus and Relational Ontology

Reconciling Three Contradictory Intuitions in Abortion Debates

Bibliographic Data

ID21701941
AuthorsStephen R Milford (0000-0002-7325-9940, North-West University, corresponding author), David Shaw (0000-0001-8180-6927, Maastricht University)
Year2024
Volume27
Issue3
Pages389-406
Publication date2024-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10677-023-10422-z
OpenAlexW4387694469
LanguageEN
References cited35

Pro-life and pro-choice advocates battle for rational dominance in abortion debates. Yet, public polling (and general legal opinion) demonstrates the public’s preference for the middle ground: that abortions are acceptable in certain circumstances and during early pregnancy. Implicit in this, are two contradictory intuitions: (1) that we were all early fetuses, and (2) abortion kills no one. To hold these positions together, Harman and Räsänen have argued for the Actual Future Principle (AFP) which distinguishes between fetuses that will develop into persons and those that will never develop into persons. However intellectually ingenious their solutions are, they fail to account for a third intuition: that the death of a wanted fetus – e.g. through termination or miscarriage – is of moral significance. Not only is this practically important, but it is also supported by public opinion. The authors of this paper argue that relational ontology can modify the AFP to better account for all three intuitions. Furthermore, it further emphasizes the pivotal role of the pregnant person who relates to their own fetus in either personal or impersonal ways. Addressing the fundamental challenges of relational ontology, the authors defend the position that human personal identity is ultimately relational

Abortion · Epistemology · Miscarriage · Ontology · Personal identity · Personhood · Philosophy of medicine · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Public opinion · Self · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology

  • Responsibilities to Future Generations

    Ernest Partridge•Responsibilities to Future…•1981

  • The Ethics of Killing

    Jeff Mcmahan•The ethics of killing•2002

  • It’s Complicated

    Open Access•K Lindsey Chambers•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2020

  • The Problem with Sandra

    Stephen R Milford, Stephen Milford•Religion and Theology•2020

  • What Makes Us Persons

    Open Access•Augustine Shutte•Modern Theology•1984

  • The One, the Three and the Many

    Open Access•Colin Gunton, Colin E Gunton•One, the Three and the Many•1993

  • Causing Death and Saving Lives

    Open Access•Richard Lindley•Philosophical Books•1978

  • Relationality and Life

    J Lenore Wright•International Journal of Feminist…•2018

  • Was I Ever a Fetus

    Eric T Olson•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997

  • Killing Humans and killing Animals

    Peter Singer•Inquiry•1979

  • Creation Ethics

    Open Access•Elizabeth Harman•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae