Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A fair exchange

Why living kidney donors in England should be financially compensated

Bibliographic Data

ID21702660
AuthorsDaniel Rodger (0000-0002-2121-7167, London South Bank University, corresponding author), Bonnie Venter (0000-0002-4277-7016, University of Bristol)
Year2023
Volume26
Issue4
Pages625-634
Publication date2023-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedicine Health Care and Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1386-7423 • E-ISSN: 1572-8633
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11019-023-10171-x
PMID37620641
OpenAlexW4386121819
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited57

Every year, hundreds of patients in England die whilst waiting for a kidney transplant, and this is evidence that the current system of altruistic-based donation is not sufficient to address the shortage of kidneys available for transplant. To address this problem, we propose a monopsony system whereby kidney donors can opt-in to receive financial compensation, whilst still preserving the right of individuals to donate without receiving any compensation. A monopsony system describes a market structure where there is only one ‘buyer’—in this case the National Health Service. By doing so, several hundred lives could be saved each year in England, wait times for a kidney transplant could be significantly reduced, and it would lessen the burden on dialysis services. Furthermore, compensation would help alleviate the common disincentives to living kidney donation, such as its potential associated health and psychological costs, and it would also help to increase awareness of living kidney donation. The proposed system would also result in significant cost savings that could then be redirected towards preventing kidney disease and reducing health disparities. While concerns about exploitation, coercion, and the ‘crowding out’ of altruistic donors exist, we believe that careful implementation can mitigate these issues. Therefore, we recommend piloting financial compensation for living kidney donors at a transplant centre in England

Actuarial science · Advertising · Business · Donation · Economic growth · Economics · Financial compensation · Kidney donation · Kidney transplantation · Medical law · Opt-out · Philosophy of medicine · Psychiatry · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Medicine · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Psychology · Renal and Vascular Pathologies · Social Psychology · Surgery · Transplantation

  • Genetic disenhancement and xenotransplantation

    Daniel Rodger, Daniel J Hurst et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Unjust organ markets and why it is irrelevant that selling a kidney is the best option

    Andreas Albertsen•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  • Organ markets, distributive justice and the limits of the best option argument

    Andreas Albertsen•Journal of Medical Ethics•2026

  • No Brain, No Pain, No Problem? The Case Against Creating Human ‘Bodyoids’

    Open Access•Daniel Rodger, Daniel J Hurst et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2025

  • Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death

    Open Access•Kyle J Foreman, Neal Marquez et al.•The Lancet•2018

  • The Gift Relationship

    Richard Titmuss, Richard Morris Titmuss•Gift Relationship•2018

  • Existing Ethical Tensions in Xenotransplantation

    Open Access•L Syd M Johnson•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2022

  • Why States Should Buy Kidneys

    Open Access•Aksel Braanen Sterri•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2021

  • Tiger Country

    Joel Tannenbaum•Configurations•2014

Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae