Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Genetic disenhancement and xenotransplantation

Diminishing pigs’ capacity to experience suffering through genetic engineering

Bibliographic Data

ID21515399
AuthorsDaniel Rodger (0000-0002-2121-7167, London South Bank University, corresponding author), Daniel J Hurst (0000-0003-0592-2592, Department of Family Medicine, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, USA), Chris Bobier (0000-0003-4194-4721, Saint Mary's University of Minnesota), Christopher A Bobier (Saint Mary's University of Minnesota, Winona, Minnesota, USA), Xavier Symons (0000-0002-9495-4395, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA)
Year2024
Volume50
Issue11
Pages729-733
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Medical Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-6800 • E-ISSN: 1473-4257
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jme-2023-109594
PMID38395623
OpenAlexW4392094539
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited31

One objection to xenotransplantation is that it will require the large-scale breeding, raising and killing of genetically modified pigs. The pigs will need to be raised in designated pathogen-free facilities and undergo a range of medical tests before having their organs removed and being euthanised. As a result, they will have significantly shortened life expectancies, will experience pain and suffering and be subject to a degree of social and environmental deprivation. To minimise the impact of these factors, we propose the following option for consideration—ethically defensible xenotransplantation should entail the use of genetic disenhancement if it becomes possible to do so and if that pain and suffering cannot be eliminated by other means. Despite not being a morally ideal ‘solution’, it is morally better to prevent unavoidable pain until a viable non-animal alternative becomes available

Bioethics · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Pain and suffering · Political science · Xenotransplantation · Engineering · Law · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Psychology · Xenotransplantation and immune response · Surgery · Transplantation

  • Ethically defensible executions? A reply to Daniel Rodger and coauthors

    David Benatar•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Defending genetic disenhancement in xenotransplantation

    Daniel Rodger, Daniel J Hurst et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Prioritisation and non-sentientist harms

    Christian Rodriguez Perez, Edwin Louis-Maerten et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Allowing for open debate in medical ethics

    Cressida Auckland•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Proceeding with care

    James J Cordeiro•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • This little piggy can’t leave the open market

    Richard B Gibson•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Xenotransplantation

    Open Access•Jasmine Gunkel, Franklin G Miller•The Hastings Center Report•2025

  • Bodyoids and Speculative Bioethics

    Open Access•Bruce P Blackshaw, Daniel Rodger et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2026

  • A fair exchange

    Open Access•Daniel Rodger, Bonnie Venter•Medicine Health Care and Philosophy•2023

  • Palliative Farming

    Open Access•Ole Martin Moen, Katrien Devolder•The Journal of Ethics•2022

  • Existing Ethical Tensions in Xenotransplantation

    Open Access•L Syd M Johnson•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2022

  • Brave New Birds

    Bernice Bovenkerk, Frans W A Brom et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2002

  • Making Sense of Animal Disenhancement

    Open Access•Adam Henschke•NanoEthics•2012

  • Animal Disenhancement in Moral Context

    Open Access•Korinn N Murphy, William Paul Kabasenche•NanoEthics•2018

  • The Opposite of Human Enhancement

    Open Access•Paul Β Thompson•NanoEthics•2008

  • Genetically Modifying Livestock for Improved Welfare

    Open Access•Adam Shriver, Emilie McConnachie•Journal of Agricultural and…•2018

Unique citing works8
Citations per year4
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae