Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bodyoids and Speculative Bioethics

A Response to Erler

Bibliographic Data

ID19562818
AuthorsBruce P Blackshaw (0000-0002-9115-582X, The University of Notre Dame Australia), Daniel Rodger (0000-0002-2121-7167, London South Bank University, corresponding author), Chris Bobier (0000-0003-4194-4721, Central Michigan University), Christopher A Bobier, Daniel J Hurst (0000-0003-0592-2592, Rowan University)
Year2026
Volume39
Issue1
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy & Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2210-5433 • E-ISSN: 2210-5441
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s13347-025-01026-9
OpenAlexW7124451437
LanguageEN
References cited9

Alexandre Erler’s commentary challenges our argument against creating human ‘bodyoids’. While he considers our concerns speculative, we briefly defend speculative bioethics as vital for anticipating ethical risks before technologies emerge. We maintain that historical practices such as organ procurement and embryo experimentation illustrate how instrumental uses of human bodies can erode moral boundaries. Erler’s confidence in safeguards like the dead donor rule is, we suggest, misplaced. Ethical reflection at this formative stage is essential to prevent the normalization of technologies that risk profound dehumanization

Bioethics · Formative assessment · Gambit · Human life · Philosophy of technology · Reflective equilibrium · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Genetic disenhancement and xenotransplantation

    Daniel Rodger, Daniel J Hurst et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Why we should not extend the 14-day rule

    Open Access•Bruce P Blackshaw, Daniel Rodger•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • The time has come to extend the 14-day limit

    Sophia McCully•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  • No Brain, No Pain, No Problem? The Case Against Creating Human ‘Bodyoids’

    Open Access•Daniel Rodger, Daniel J Hurst et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2025

  • Bodyoids or Body Parts? Commentary on Rodger et al., “No Brain, No Pain, No Problem?”

    Open Access•Alexandre Erler•Philosophy & Technology•2026

  • Brain Death and the Historical Understanding of Bioethics

    Gary S Belkin•Journal of the History of…•2003

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae