Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Promotion of Sustainable Development Principles Through the Design Review Process. The Case of the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel

Bibliographic Data

ID21719355
AuthorsNicky Morrison (0000-0001-6774-5945, Western Sydney University, corresponding author), Lidija Honegger (WSP UK Ltd)
Year2022
Volume23
Issue3
Pages329-348
Publication date2022-05-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePlanning Theory & Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1464-9357 • E-ISSN: 1470-000X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14649357.2022.2050282
OpenAlexW4226030645
LanguageEN
References cited26

The quest to deliver sustainable development has led to a search for ways to engage all stakeholders in this collective endeavour. Currently, local planners across England and elsewhere use independent design review panels to help raise the design quality of new developments. This paper examines the extent to which such panels can instill the need to adhere to sustainable development principles. We focus on the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel, which has framed its review process around sustainable development principles, named the “4 Cs”: community, connectivity, climate, and character. Situating the panel’s work within a design governance framework, we scrutinise the value and limitations of this particular governance tool. We conclude that local planners’ ability to take forward the panel’s recommendations on delivering new developments to high sustainability standards remains problematic, compromised by national priorities and market decisions

Business · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Process management · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Computer Science · Engineering · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

  • Urban Planning in Europe

    Peter Newman, Andy Thornley•Urban Planning In Europe•2002

  • The Brundtland report

    Brian R Keeble, Brian Keeble•Medicine and War•1988

  • The Planner's Triangle Revisited

    Scott Campbell•Journal of the American Planning…•2016

  • Marketizing the governance of design

    Open Access•Matthew Carmona•Journal of Urban Design•2019

  • Design governance

    Open Access•Matthew Carmona•Journal of Urban Design•2016

  • Design Governance, Austerity and the Public Interest

    Open Access•Robert Richardson, James T White•Planning Theory & Practice•2021

  • Design guidelines for wieldier discretionary review

    Ramzi Farhat•Journal of Urban Design•2021

  • Case Study Research

    John Gerring•Case Study Research•2006

  • Is Semi-Discretionary Design Review Wieldy? Evidence from Seattle’s Program

    Ramzi Farhat•Planning Practice and Research•2019

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Qualitative Inquiry•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae