The Promotion of Sustainable Development Principles Through the Design Review Process. The Case of the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21719355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicky Morrison (0000-0001-6774-5945, Western Sydney University, corresponding author), Lidija Honegger (WSP UK Ltd) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 329-348 |
| Publication date | 2022-05-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Planning Theory & Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-9357 • E-ISSN: 1470-000X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14649357.2022.2050282 |
| OpenAlex | W4226030645 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 26 |
The quest to deliver sustainable development has led to a search for ways to engage all stakeholders in this collective endeavour. Currently, local planners across England and elsewhere use independent design review panels to help raise the design quality of new developments. This paper examines the extent to which such panels can instill the need to adhere to sustainable development principles. We focus on the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel, which has framed its review process around sustainable development principles, named the “4 Cs”: community, connectivity, climate, and character. Situating the panel’s work within a design governance framework, we scrutinise the value and limitations of this particular governance tool. We conclude that local planners’ ability to take forward the panel’s recommendations on delivering new developments to high sustainability standards remains problematic, compromised by national priorities and market decisions
Business · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Process management · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Computer Science · Engineering · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Urban Planning in Europe
The Brundtland report
The Planner's Triangle Revisited
Marketizing the governance of design
Design governance
Design Governance, Austerity and the Public Interest
Design guidelines for wieldier discretionary review
Case Study Research
Is Semi-Discretionary Design Review Wieldy? Evidence from Seattle’s Program
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|