Gracing of Sociotechnical Virtues
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21725379 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Graves (0000-0003-3146-3203, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 526-542 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theology and Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1474-6700 • E-ISSN: 1474-6719 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14746700.2025.2514303 |
| OpenAlex | W4411531064 |
| Language | EN |
Can AI be virtuous? The answer depends upon one’s definitions of virtue and AI. A meaningful threshold is to consider virtue theologically, as something that could receive grace, and to situate AI sociotechnically, recognizing mutual influences between technology and society. Extending the human dispositions and ends underlying virtue to include computational dispositions and norms facilitates examining sociotechnical virtue. I argue that even if virtue requires grace for full realization, AI can still be virtuous in its sociotechnical context. I illustrate this through the gracing of sociotechnical virtue from Protestant (John Wesley), Roman Catholic (Karl Rahner), and Orthodox Christian (Irenaeus) perspectives
Epistemology · Knowledge management · Sociology · Sociotechnical system · Computer Science · Ethics in Business and Education · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|