Some Considerations on the Theory of Emanation in Alfarabi, Avicenna, and al-Ghazālī
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21725570 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catarina Belo (0000-0002-8283-0790, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 596-607 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theology and Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1474-6700 • E-ISSN: 1474-6719 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14746700.2025.2514309 |
| OpenAlex | W4411499930 |
| Language | EN |
This chapter, inspired by Edward Moad's analysis of al-Ghazālī's approach to the theory of emanation, offers a comparative analysis of that theory, according to Alfarabi and Avicenna, and assesses al-Ghazālī's response. Al-Ghazālī holds that emanation constitutes a major obstacle to a correct conception of God as portrayed in the Qurʾan. More specifically, it is incompatible with a correct understanding of God's attributes, in particular God's knowledge and will, and more broadly with God's agency. Although he criticizes both Alfarabi and Avicenna, al-Ghazālī's account of emanation is fundamentally more indebted to Avicenna's model than to that of Alfarabi
Epistemology · Traditional medicine · Families in Therapy and Culture · Islamic Thought and Society Studies · Medicine · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |