Misinformation about fake news
A systematic critical review of empirical studies on the phenomenon and its status as a ‘threat’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21727316 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernando Miró-Llinares (0000-0001-6379-5857, Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx), Jesús C Aguerri (0000-0002-7730-8527, Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 356-374 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Criminology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1477-3708 • E-ISSN: 1741-2609 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1477370821994059 |
| OpenAlex | W3155638494 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 57 |
After the 2016 US presidential elections, the term ‘fake news’ became synonymous with disinformation and a catch-all term for the problems that social networks were bringing to communication. Four years later, there are dozens of empirical studies that have attempted to describe and analyse an issue that, despite still being in the process of definition, has been identified as one of the key COVID-19 cyberthreats by Interpol, is considered a threat to democracy by many states and supranational institutions and, as a consequence, is subject to regulation or even criminalization. These legislative and criminal policy interventions form part of the first stage in the construction of a moral panic that may lead to the restriction of freedom of expression and information. By analysing empirical research that attempts to measure the extent of the issue and its impact, the present article aims to provide critical reflection on the process of constructing fake news as a threat. Via a systematic review of the literature, we observe, firstly, that the concept of fake news used in empirical research is limited and should be refocused because it has not been constructed according to scientific criteria and can fail to include relevant elements and actors, such as governments and traditional media. Secondly, the article analyses what is known scientifically about the extent, consumption and impact of fake news and argues that it is problematic to establish causal relationships between the issue and the effects it has been said to produce. This conclusion requires us to conduct further research and to reconsider the position of fake news as a threat as well as the resulting regulation and criminalization
Criminalization · Criminology · Disinformation · Economics · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Epistemology · Law and economics · Misinformation · Moral panic · Phenomenon · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Spam and Phishing Detection
Searching for cyberspace
Miradas comunicacionales de la polarización política en entornos digitales, una revisión bibliográfica
Folk theories of fake news
A systematic review of existing community development models and frameworks
Odio, polarización social y clase media en Las Mañaneras de López Obrador
Living the Lab
Exploring the impact of online misinformation on ideological polarisation and institutional distrust
Between the expected and the experienced
(Why) Is Misinformation a Problem
The Return of The Thaumaturge Kings
Young people and false information
Surveillance, Disinformation, and Legislative Measures in the 21st Century
News Informs and Boosts Discernment
When social media feeds classic punitivism on media
What Is the Problem with Misinformation? Fact-checking as a Sociotechnical and Problem-Solving Practice
Explaining public communication change
Mapa mundial del fact-checking en Instagram. Formatos de contenido y su efecto en el engagement
Building trust in the generative AI era
Understanding the Use of Private Messaging Apps in Canada and Links to Disinformation
The researcher’s bias in fake news automatic detection
Understanding Audience Threat Perceptions of Misinformation
Lies for the greater good? Russian perceptions of the (un)acceptability of disinformation
Advancements in Rumor Detection Research Based on Bibliometrics and S-curve Technology Evolution Theory
Synews
Criminology and Propaganda Studies
Assessing potential disinformation campaigns in anonymous online comments
Misinformation on Misinformation
Fake News in the Field of Covid Communication
A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere? With, against, and beyond Habermas
The Myth of Moral Panics
“Fake News” and Emerging Online Media Ecosystem
‘Fake news’
The drugtakers
Policing the Crisis
Fake news as an informational moral panic
Media and Crime
Fake News and The Economy of Emotions
Lazy, not biased
Fake News as a Floating Signifier
The diffusion of misinformation on social media
Defining “Fake News”
The facts of fake news
To catch a predator? The MySpace moral panic
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media
Fake News
Fake News as Discursive Integration
The small, disloyal fake news audience
Social media and moral panics
"The Impact of Real News about "Fake News
Fake news”
The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News
The disinformation order
With Facebook, Blogs, and Fake News, Teens Reject Journalistic “Objectivity”
Fake news’ meets tourism
Miley, CNN and The Onion
The Daily Show
On the concept of moral panic
From contempt of court to fake news
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture
Fake news' is the invention of a liar
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 27 |