Interactivism mechanized
Bridging the gap between cognition, correspondence, and computation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21750797 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcin Miłkowski (0000-0001-7646-5742, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1568-7759 • E-ISSN: 1572-8676 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11097-025-10082-7 |
| OpenAlex | W4411472669 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 72 |
This paper augments Mark Bickhard’s interactivist model by incorporating mechanistic explanation, computation, and a non-encodingist correspondence. It argues for a mechanistic framework (drawing on the new mechanism’s focus on organized entities and activities) that preserves core interactivist principles: process ontology, representation as emergent from interaction, rejection of encodingism, and the centrality of system-detectable error. However, grounding representational normativity solely in action outcomes or self-maintenance faces limitations. This paper proposes instead that normativity arises from epistemic norms within cognitive problem-solving, encompassing alethic, pragmatic, and economic dimensions addressed through bounded rationality under functional constraints. A novel framework integrating interactivism with this mechanistic view, computation, and infocorrespondence (a specific, non-encodingist correspondence based on information channels) is developed. This framework emphasizes semantic information processed by computational mechanisms, with inconsistency detection between information vehicles (leveraging informational redundancy) serving as a key system-accessible proxy for representational error (falsity). This synthesis offers a more robust account of error detection, the truth-success relationship, and the grounding of epistemic normativity, thereby enriching interactivist theory
Algorithm · Cognitive science · Computation · Epistemology · Philosophy of mind · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Artificial Intelligence · Theoretical Computer Science
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories
Discovering Complexity
Representation in Cognitive Science
Representation Reconsidered
Origins of Objectivity
Radicalizing Enactivism
Neurocognitive Mechanisms
Information, Mechanism and Meaning
Physical Computation
Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature
Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings
Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system †
Features of similarity.
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
On aims and methods of Ethology
What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences
Fuzzy sets
The Concept of Truth
Mathematics, Matter and Method
The Hard Problem of Content is Neither
Mechanism is not enough
Ecological mechanisms in cognitive science
Signals
"What Is "Naturalized Epistemology
Natural sources of normativity
Is truth a normative concept
Constitutive relevance & mutual manipulability revisited
The interactivist model
Why go for a computation-based approach to cognitive representation
Vindicating methodological triangulation
Representations gone mental
How can embodied cognition naturalize bounded rationality
The Formats of Cognitive Representation
Thinking about Mechanisms
The Functional Sense of Mechanism
A Confutation of Convergent Realism
Cognitive Systematization
Correspondence Theory of Semantic Information
The Semantics Latent in Shannon Information
Explaining the Computational Mind
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |