Digitalisation Anxiety in Czech Industrial Workplaces
A Multilevel Qualitative Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21755219 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marek Nechvátal (Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs), Josef Sencik (Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs), Katerina Vesela (Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs), Vaclav Mraz (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague), Martin Štěpánek (0000-0001-7368-3680, Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Society and Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1588-970X • E-ISSN: 1588-9726 |
| Publisher | Corvinus University of Budapest (PUBLISHER • HU) |
| DOI | 10.14267/1588970x.2026.009 |
| OpenAlex | W7160828277 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Digitalisation is reshaping industrial work, yet employees’ lived experience determines whether its promised value is realised. Drawing on 66 semi‐structured interviews with employees in Czech industrial workplaces, this study maps overall stance and delineates multilevel triggers of digitalisation‐related anxiety. A large majority expressed a predominantly optimistic view (53/66; 80.3%), while pessimistic (5/66; 7.6%) and ambivalent (8/66; 12.1%) minorities reported concerns. Anxiety clustered at societal (e.g., macro‐uncertainty about employment and safety due to failures), organisational (implementation quality, availability of qualified staff, training and help desks, transparency of data‐driven monitoring) and individual levels (interpersonal frictions, fatigue, sleep disturbance). Across levels, uncertainty emerged as the primary driver, interacting with perceived decision latitude and support. On this basis, we outline actionable interventions: the transparent communication of scope and timelines; participatory implementation to increase discretion; task‐relevant training and competent help desks; team‐level norms that contain communication overload; and individual bounded‐attention routines that reduce techno‐overload. Conceptually, the paper advances a process‐plus‐content perspective on digitalisation anxiety that integrates societal, organisational and individual triggers and clarifies where to target the socio‐technical system. While qualitative and sector‐specific, the findings are transferable rather than statistically generalisable and provide a practical scaffold for designing interventions that sustain employees’ broadly positive orientation while tempering anxiety during ongoing digital change
Ambiguity · Ambivalence · Anxiety · Perception · Pessimism · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Scarcity · Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior · Technostress in Professional Settings · Workplace Health and Well-being
Understanding digital transformation
Perceptions of organizational change
The dark side of technologies
Digital Innovation Management
The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations
Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes
Technostress
Uncertainty During Organizational Change
The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity
Digitalization
Systematic methodological review
The qualitative content analysis process
Qualitative research in health care
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
The future of employment
Language differences in qualitative research
Collecting Qualitative Data
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research
Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Naturalistic inquiry
Technostress
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research
Thematic Analysis
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Highly cited | No |
|---|