Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bridging the gap between “the platform society” and technopolitics — a systematic literature review about digital democracy platforms

Bibliographic Data

ID21765603
AuthorsRafael Pinheiro Lopes (International Commission on Illumination), Vania Baldi (0000-0002-7663-3328, Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa), Guya Accornero (0000-0002-6011-7329, Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa)
Year2025
Volume19
Issue1
Publication date2025-03-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueObservatorio (OBS (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1646-5954 • E-ISSN: 1646-5954
PublisherInstituto Universitario de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15847/obsobs19120252613
OpenAlexW4409015247
LanguageEN

The subject of digital democracy platforms has gained interest in recent years, driven by the surge of online participation mechanisms provided by political parties and governmental institutions as a response to declining rates of interest in more traditional forms of political engagement and demands about democratic reform. However, several case studies cast doubts about the capability of such platforms to result in meaningful political change and effectively pushing the boundaries of representative democracy. To synthesize the most recent scientific contributions to this topic, a systematic literature review was conducted to analyze research published in 2023 about the contributions of digital democracy platforms for political participation, their impact on democracy and the variables that influence their implementation and adoption, ultimately leading to their successes or failures. 125 articles were collected to have their findings analyzed. The conclusions of this systematic literature review suggest that digital democracy platforms decrease the costs of participation and facilitate the escalation of participative initiatives for larger numbers of citizens without the spatial and temporal constraints of analogue forms of participation. However, these platforms face a diverse set of obstacles. Most users are from more affluent socioeconomic backgrounds and the lack of informal institutionalization, or willingness by lawmakers to prioritize citizen inputs to participative governance, leads to rarely effective changes in policymaking.Keywords: digital democracy; online platforms; platformization; political participation; systematic literature review

Computer security · Democracy · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Law · Social Media and Politics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae