Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cameo Performance and Industrial Allegory in Joanna Hogg’s The Souvenir and The Souvenir

Part II

Bibliographic Data

ID21785000
AuthorsLuke Robinson (0000-0002-8324-8786, University of Sussex, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume23
Issue2
Pages227-246
Publication date2026-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Cinema and Television (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1743-4521 • E-ISSN: 1755-1714
PublisherEdinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3366/jbctv.2026.0813
OpenAlexW7167686416
LanguageEN
References cited18

This article explores Joanna Hogg’s The Souvenir (2019) and The Souvenir: Part II (2021) as reflexive commentaries on casting and structural exclusion in the British film industry. Contra the history of non-professional casting, Hogg’s tendency to recruit ambiguously non-professional performers from within her inner circle exacerbates her cinema’s racial and social exclusivity. This dynamic is revealed in The Souvenir and The Souvenir: Part II through Hogg’s use of cameo roles that collapse the diegetic and extra-diegetic spaces of her films, drawing attention to the social and industrial networks underpinning both her filmmaking and UK cinema more broadly. In The Souvenir, the sudden appearance of Richard Ayoade and his wife, Lydia Fox, enacts a drama of exposure that hints at how class and racial difference structure access in the British film industry. The Souvenir: Part II works to bury this knowledge through a diegetic drama of diversity that naturalises structural exclusion via a narrative of artistic inspiration. But Charlie Heaton’s cameo as actor Jim undercuts this logic, directing attention, through an on-screen drama of sexual reproduction, to the ways in which class and racial homophily work to reproduce inequality in the film industry. Ultimately, The Souvenir and The Souvenir: Part II are not simply auto-fictional reflections on the artistic process, but industrial allegories that explore how Hogg’s cinema participates in the British film industry’s characteristic structural exclusions, and the part her use of non-professional performers plays in this process

Allegory · Drama · Film director · Filmmaking · Hollywood · Movie theater · Narrative · Queer · Reflexivity · Cinema and Media Studies · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism · Theater, Performance, and Music History

  • British Film Policy in an Age of Austerity

    Open Access•J Newsinger•Journal of British Cinema and…•2012

  • Culture is bad for you

    Orian Brooks, Dave O'Brien et al.•Culture Is Bad for You•2020

  • Explicit and Implicit Diversity Policy in the UK Film and Television Industries

    Open Access•J Newsinger, Doris Ruth Eikhof•Journal of British Cinema and…•2020

  • Ken Loach and the Comedians

    Open Access•Neil Archer•Journal of British Cinema and…•2021

  • Temporary Accommodation

    John David Rhodes•Film Quarterly•2020

  • Diversity pie

    Clive James Nwonka•Journal of Media Practice•2015

  • White Women, White Men, and Intra-Racial Diversity

    Open Access•Clive James Nwonka•Cultural Sociology•2021

  • Resistance and Resignation

    Open Access•Friedman, Sam Friedman et al.•Cultural Sociology•2017

  • Defacement

    Michael Taussig, Michael J Taussig•Defacement•1999

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae