Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scientific integrity

Perceptions and recommendations from a qualitative study with actors of the science, technology, and innovation system in Colombia

Bibliographic Data

ID21787573
AuthorsBernal-Camargo Diana Rocío (0000-0001-9345-2193, Universidad del Rosario, corresponding author), Carlos Enrique Trillos-Peña (Universidad del Rosario), Diego Agudelo-Grajales (Department of Humanities, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Cali, Cali, Colombia), Diego Agudelo Grajales (0000-0001-9089-595X, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Jackeline Bravo Chamorro (0000-0001-5980-7085, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Sandra Liliana Londoño Calero (0000-0002-9130-7504, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana), Alix Rocío Barrios-Mendez (0000-0002-3247-9760, Universidad del Rosario), Gisel Natalia Ortega-Martínez (Hospital Universitario Mayor de Mederi, Bogota, Colombia), Viviana Rodríguez-Torres (Hospital Universitario Mayor de Mederi, Bogota, Colombia)
Year2026
Volume22
Issue3
Pages539-554
Publication date2026-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueResearch Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-0161 • E-ISSN: 2047-6094
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17470161251377473
OpenAlexW4414628641
LanguageEN
References cited17

The review of the scientific literature has provided evidence of the presence of scientific misconduct and questionable conduct in research (QCR), without further studies in different countries, including Colombia. This study aims to provide results of qualitative research on the perceptions and recommendations associated with scientific integrity in the country. Interviews were conducted with researchers, peer reviewers, editors and research directors or managers of universities and research centers in the country. The results reveal the need to promote institutional policies and improve practices that help strengthen the national policy on scientific integrity. A strong correlation was also found between misconduct, lack of knowledge of authorship criteria, difficulties in peer review, research data management and the processes of research memory due to the pressure of the national research system and the institutions to meet goals within it

Misconduct · Peer review · Perception · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Rigour · Scientific Misconduct · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence · Educational Research and Science Teaching

  • Research Misconduct in East Asia’s Research Environments

    Bak Hee-Je•East Asian Science Technology and…•2018

  • The Importance of Organizational Justice in Ensuring Research Integrity

    Open Access•Brian C Martinson, A Lauren Crain et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2010

  • Normal Misbehavior

    Open Access•Raymond G De Vries, Melissa S Anderson et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae