How far removed is human–chatbot parasocial attachment from human intimacy? A study based on communication accommodation theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21790248 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lanyan Fang (0009-0008-1361-1165, Xiamen University), Hongfeng Qiu (0000-0002-8490-5522, Xiamen University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Chinese Journal of Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1754-4769 • E-ISSN: 1754-4750 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17544750.2025.2599116 |
| OpenAlex | W4417430280 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
Despite the widespread use of artificial intelligence technologies in romantic engagements involving humans and chatbots, the potential and limitations of such parasocial attachments have yet to receive sufficient academic attention. Applying communication accommodation theory and a mixed-methods approach, this study examined how romantic chatbots accommodate users’ personalized affective needs. The findings revealed that approximation, discourse management, and emotional expression are three strategies that chatbots moderately accommodate, contributing to positive emotional responses from users. In contrast, interpretability and relational control, which are highly context-sensitive skills, are linked to underaccommodation and negative emotional responses among users. These insights comprehensively clarify the evolving nature of romantic involvement between humans and chatbots. They also highlight multifaceted constraints on the ability of companion chatbots to replicate intimate interactions among people. This study extends parasocial interaction (PSI) theory and Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) to human–AI romantic contexts and informs the design and governance of companion chatbots
Accommodation · Attachment theory · Communication theory · Qualitative research · Social relation · AI in Service Interactions · Media Influence and Health · Social Robot Interaction and HRI
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum
Human vs. AI
Parasocial Interaction
Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence
User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts
Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not
Speech Rate Adjustments in Conversations With an Amazon Alexa Socialbot
Should chatbots use dialects? Exploring the influence mechanism of chatbot language form on value co-creation intention
Exploring relationship development with social chatbots
“In A.I. we trust?” The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging “feeling economy”
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app
Social companionship with artificial intelligence
Freud, Frankenstein and our fear of robots
Male homosocial bonds and perceptions of human–robot relationships in an online sex doll forum
When in doubt, lay it out
Relationship Satisfaction as a Function of Perceived Similarity in Religious and Political Beliefs and Identity Accommodation
A tool or a social being? A dynamic longitudinal investigation of functional use and relational use of AI voice assistants
Too human and not human enough
Finding love in algorithms
How does anthropomorphism promote consumer responses to social chatbots
Two uncanny valleys
Responses to CAT at 50
My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships
Communication accommodation theory
Conversations Between Carers and People With Schizophrenia
Accommodating the elderly
The Commodification of Intimacy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |