Governmental practices of regularisation
Assessment of eligibility criteria in Canada's 1973 Adjustment of Status Program
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21790842 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Moffette (0000-0002-4131-2671, University of Ottawa, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3/4 |
| Pages | 218-239 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Migration and Border Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-2419 • E-ISSN: 1755-2427 |
| Publisher | Inderscience Publishers (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1504/ijmbs.2024.145453 |
| OpenAlex | W4409085870 |
| Language | EN |
In the contested politics of mobility, programs to regularise undocumented immigrants act simultaneously as progressive tools for social inclusion, and as bordering devices organised around states' assessment of desirability. This article studies these dynamics during the most significant regularisation program in Canada's history, the 1973 Adjustment of Status Program. Drawing on an analysis of institutional archival material, parliamentary debates, and news articles from that era, the article explores the logics and practices of governmental actors involved in designing, promoting, and implementing the program, paying close attention to criteria of inclusion and exclusion. It shows how, constrained by a short timeline and the pressure of advocacy groups, government officials repeatedly opted to ease the assessment of eligibility criteria. Ultimately, the article demonstrates that a politics of regularisation is fundamentally a politics of negotiation, and draws lessons that could inform contemporary programs
Actuarial science · Business · Political science · Canadian Identity and History · Education Systems and Policy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |