Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Online Scaffolding Strategies

Case Studies of Asian EFL Learners in an Academic Writing Course

Bibliographic Data

ID21806339
AuthorsNakhon Kitjaroonchai (0000-0003-2965-4932, Asia Pacific International University), Chomphunut Phutikettrkit (Asia Pacific International University)
Year2022
Volume12
Issue10
Pages2036-2047
Publication date2022-09-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692
PublisherAcademy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.17507/tpls.1210.10
OpenAlexW4298627146
LanguageEN
References cited7

The article reported a case study investigating the scaffolding strategies of twelve Asian EFL learners in four small groups’ scaffolding strategies during two online collaborative writing (OCW) tasks in a composition course using Google Docs as a writing platform. Of interest was how EFL learners with different L1 scaffold each other while co-constructing OCW tasks, and also if scaffolding strategies used during OCW tasks influence writing performance. Data collection included pre-test and post-test writing, two OCW tasks on descriptive and argumentative essays, learners’ use of scaffolding and non-scaffolding negotiations during OCW tasks observed through Google Docs revision history, and student reflection. The findings showed that learners in small groups employed both scaffolding and non-scaffolding dialogues to jointly construct their OCW tasks by giving advice, providing suggestions, responding to questions or requests, asking questions, or clarifying ideas. Learners who contributed more texts directed their team and initiated both scaffolding negotiations and non-negotiations while performing group work. The study results also revealed that members who employed more scaffolding negotiations during their OCW processes likely produced a better quality of writing in their post-test. Nevertheless, these findings indicated that members in small groups benefited from both scaffolding and non-scaffolding negotiations as they helped in task revisions. The findings contributed to research that has investigated online scaffolding strategies in EFL learners’ collaborative writing tasks

Argumentative · English as a foreign language · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Negotiation · Scaffold · Sociology · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Engineering · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology

  • The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky's Analysis of Learning and Instruction

    Open Access•Seth Chaiklin•Vygotsky's Educational Theory in…•2003

  • Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction

    Open Access•Janneke Van De Pol, Monique Volman et al.•Educational Psychology Review•2010

  • Case Study Research

    Harris Chaiklin•The Journal of Nervous and Mental…•1991

  • Online Collaborative Writing via Google Docs

    Open Access•Nakhon Kitjaroonchai, Suksan Suppasetseree•Journal of Language Teaching and…•2021

  • Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes

    Open Access•Saeed Latifi, Omid Noroozi et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2021

  • Teacher-student interaction on wikis

    Open Access•Maha Alghasab, Jan Hardman et al.•Learning Culture and Social…•2019

  • Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance

    Alireza Memari Hanjani, Li Li•System•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae