L2 Teachers’ Oral Corrective Feedback Practices in Relation to Their CF Beliefs and Learner Uptake
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21807099 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Md Nesar Uddin (0000-0001-8388-5024, University of Memphis, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 617-628 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692 |
| Publisher | Academy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17507/tpls.1204.01 |
| OpenAlex | W4225353199 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Over the years, instructed SLA research emphasized corrective feedback (CF) interactions in different instructional contexts and showed the facilitative role of CF in L2 development. However, little research has investigated teachers' CF practices in relation to their beliefs and their impact on learner uptake in heritage language learning contexts. Through structured observations and semi-structured interviews, this study examined two teachers' CF practices, beliefs, and their impact on L2 learning in Arabic as a Heritage Language (AHL) context in one lower intermediate (LI) and one higher intermediate (HI) proficiency classes in a K-12 school in the USA. A total of 20 hour-observation data from two classes with 30 students were collected and coded based on Lyster and Ranta's (1997, 2007) taxonomy of CF types. The interview data were collected from the two class teachers and thematically coded and analyzed based on the grounded theory approach. The results showed that both teachers shared positive beliefs about CF, and preference for implicit CF and prompts. LI Teacher’s CF practices largely and HI Teacher’s practices fully reflected their CF beliefs. Whereas LI Teacher largely provided feedback for learners’ lexical errors, HI Teacher predominantly responded to learners’ grammatical errors. LI Teacher’s use of elicitation, recast, and metalinguistic feedback prove effective in leading to high uptake and repair rate. On the other hand, elicitation, and clarification requests in HI Teachers’ class were the most effective CF types. The findings suggest that teachers with informed knowledge of CF can provide CF that might ultimately lead to high uptake and repair
Corrective Feedback · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Preference · Second-language acquisition · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Mathematics · Multilingual Education and Policy · Psychology · Second Language Learning and Teaching
Oral Feedback in Classroom Sla
Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development
Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings
Cultural Differences in Student and Teacher Perceptions Concerning the Role of Grammar Instruction and Corrective Feedback
Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development
Teachers' Stated Beliefs about Incidental Focus on Form and their Classroom Practices
Language Policy, Language Teachers' Beliefs, and Classroom Practices
The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs
Exploring non-native English-speaking teachers' cognitions about corrective feedback in teaching English oral communication
The impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback
Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students
The relationship between adult EFL teachers' oral feedback practices and their beliefs
Oral corrective feedback in L2 Chinese classes
Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System
Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom
Grammar Teaching and Learning in L2
Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake
The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in SLA
Prompts Versus Recasts in Dyadic Interaction
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |