Unveiling the Middle Ground
Intermediate-Level Linguistic Differences and Their Influence on L2 Writing Proficiency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21808093 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guo Lichao (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah), Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi (0000-0002-8301-8198, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah), Abdullah Adnan Mohamed (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah), Nguyen Truong Sa, Nguyen Ba Truong (Universities Austria) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1567-1578 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692 |
| Publisher | Academy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17507/tpls.1505.22 |
| OpenAlex | W4410006873 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
This study examines whether and how adult L2 learners' awareness of intermediate-level language difference (ILLD) affects their writing competence. Quantitative data were collected from 75 English-major university students using an explanatory sequential design, through questionnaires and IELTS Writing Task 2 tests. Correlation and error analyses revealed that understanding distinctions like the use of cohesive devices and substitution of words was linked to higher writing quality. Focus group interviews show that participants recognized the importance of these differences but often struggled to apply them in writing. Error analysis identified common issues, such as the lack of conjunctions and repetitive expressions. 3 of the 8 linguistic differences, including hypotactic versus hypotactic, impersonal versus personal and substitutive versus repetitive, had moderate correlations with writing competence, leading to frequent errors despite learners' theoretical knowledge. Less prominent differences, like indirect versus direct expression, showed weaker correlations and fewer errors. The study contributes both quantitative and qualitative evidence to a field previously dominated by surface-level analyses of CLI. Findings emphasize the need for guided practice in teaching ILLD. Targeted pedagogical interventions can enhance second language writing instruction, improving learners' accuracy, fluency, and overall communicative competence
Linguistics · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition
Learning to Communicate in the Classroom
Shared syntax and cross-linguistic influence in bilingual children
Cross-linguistic awareness-raising practices can enhance written performance in EFL classes in Japanese universities
Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning
| Highly cited | No |
|---|