Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unveiling the Middle Ground

Intermediate-Level Linguistic Differences and Their Influence on L2 Writing Proficiency

Bibliographic Data

ID21808093
AuthorsGuo Lichao (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah), Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi (0000-0002-8301-8198, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah), Abdullah Adnan Mohamed (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah), Nguyen Truong Sa, Nguyen Ba Truong (Universities Austria)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue5
Pages1567-1578
Publication date2025-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory and Practice in Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1799-2591 • E-ISSN: 2053-0692
PublisherAcademy Publication (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.17507/tpls.1505.22
OpenAlexW4410006873
LanguageEN
References cited5

This study examines whether and how adult L2 learners' awareness of intermediate-level language difference (ILLD) affects their writing competence. Quantitative data were collected from 75 English-major university students using an explanatory sequential design, through questionnaires and IELTS Writing Task 2 tests. Correlation and error analyses revealed that understanding distinctions like the use of cohesive devices and substitution of words was linked to higher writing quality. Focus group interviews show that participants recognized the importance of these differences but often struggled to apply them in writing. Error analysis identified common issues, such as the lack of conjunctions and repetitive expressions. 3 of the 8 linguistic differences, including hypotactic versus hypotactic, impersonal versus personal and substitutive versus repetitive, had moderate correlations with writing competence, leading to frequent errors despite learners' theoretical knowledge. Less prominent differences, like indirect versus direct expression, showed weaker correlations and fewer errors. The study contributes both quantitative and qualitative evidence to a field previously dominated by surface-level analyses of CLI. Findings emphasize the need for guided practice in teaching ILLD. Targeted pedagogical interventions can enhance second language writing instruction, improving learners' accuracy, fluency, and overall communicative competence

Linguistics · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition

    Scott Jarvi, SCOTT JARVIS et al.•Crosslinguistic Influence in…•2008

  • Learning to Communicate in the Classroom

    Open Access•Rod Ellis•Studies in Second Language…•1992

  • Shared syntax and cross-linguistic influence in bilingual children

    Open Access•Sharon Unsworth•Linguistic Approaches to…•2025

  • Cross-linguistic awareness-raising practices can enhance written performance in EFL classes in Japanese universities

    Matt Lucas, Matthew Wycliffe Lucas et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning

    Kristy Mcmanus•Language Awareness•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae