Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Are Mentalizing Systems Necessary? An Alternative Through Self–other Distinction

Bibliographic Data

ID21822977
AuthorsMasayuki Watanabe (0000-0002-8800-7260, Shiga University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume15
Issue1
Pages29-49
Publication date2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Philosophy and Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1878-5158 • E-ISSN: 1878-5166
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s13164-022-00656-8
OpenAlexW4294867680
LanguageEN
References cited107

Recent studies have identified two important findings on infants’ capability of taking others’ perspectives and the difficulty of ignoring perspectives irrelevant to the acquired perspective. Unfortunately, there is insufficient consensus on the interpretation of these phenomena. Two important features of perspective-taking, embodiment and aging, should be considered to reach a more appropriate hypothesis. In this paper, the mechanism of perspective-taking can be redefined through the well-known process of self–other distinction, which is inherent to humans, without resorting to either the assumption of controversial systems or an excessive reduction to executive functions. Therefore, it is hypothesized that the implicit mentalizing observed in infancy comes from the loosening phenomenon and lasts lifelong and that the self-representation separated from one’s own body by the detachment function is sent to other perspectives for explicit perspective-taking. This hypothesis can not only explain both the robustness of perspective-taking in the older adults and the appearance of egocentric/altercentric bias in adults but also is consistent with the findings in brain science and neuropathology. Finally, some issues to be considered are presented to improve the validity of this hypothesis

Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Epistemology · Mentalization · Metaphysics · Phenomenon · Philosophy of mind · Philosophy of science · Action Observation and Synchronization · Child and Animal Learning Development · Computer Science · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • False-belief understanding in infants

    Open Access•Renée Baillargeon, Rose M Scott et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2010

  • Seeing it their way

    Dana Samson, Ian A Apperly et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2010

  • Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs

    Open Access•Christopher Krupenye, Fumihiro Kano et al.•Science•2016

  • Mirror Neurons, Embodied Simulation, and the Neural Basis of Social Identification

    Vittorio Gallese•Psychoanalytic Dialogues•2009

  • Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm

    Open Access•David Buttelmann, Malinda Carpenter et al.•Cognition•2009

  • How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind

    Open Access•Stephen Butterfill, Stephen A Butterfill et al.•Mind & Language•2013

  • Philosophical conceptions of the self

    Open Access•Shaun Gallagher•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2000

  • Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see

    Open Access•M M Botvinick, Matthew Botvinick et al.•Nature•1998

  • Submentalizing

    Open Access•Cecilia Heyes•Perspectives on Psychological…•2014

  • Mindreading in Infancy

    Open Access•Peter Carruthers•Mind & Language•2013

  • Maternal Mind–Mindedness and Attachment Security as Predictors of Theory of Mind Understanding

    Open Access•Elizabeth Meins, Charles Fernyhough et al.•Child Development•2002

  • How children come to understand false beliefs

    Open Access•M Tomasello•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?

    Open Access•Kristine H Onishi, Renée Baillargeon•Science•2005

  • The Social Sense

    Open Access•Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Ernő Téglás et al.•Science•2010

  • Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?

    Ian A Apperly, Stephen Butterfill et al.•Psychological Review•2009

  • Level 1 perspective‐taking at 24 months of age

    Open Access•Hans Moll, Henrike Moll et al.•British Journal of Developmental…•2006

  • Role of the Embodied Cognition Process in Perspective-Taking Ability During Childhood

    Open Access•Masahiro Hirai, Yukako Muramatsu et al.•Child Development•2020

  • Beyond the comparator model

    Open Access•Matthis Synofzik, Gottfried Vosgerau et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2008

  • To belief or not belief

    Open Access•Ted Ruffman•Developmental Review•2014

  • Managing Transitions and Continuities in Ghanaian Trading Contexts

    Open Access•Gracia Clark, Jan Zwickel et al.•African Economic History•2004

  • Young children's knowledge about visual perception

    John H Flavell, Barbara Everett et al.•Developmental Psychology•1981

  • The grounded nature of psychological perspective-taking

    Thorsten M Erle, Sascha Topolinski•Journal of Personality and Social…•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae