Eye and lips in artistic profiles

Bibliographic Data

ID21832633
AuthorsMarco Costa (0000-0001-5288-4838), L Bonetti (0000-0001-9983-3819)
Year2022
Volume16
Issue4
Pages694-703
Publication date2022-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1931-3896 • E-ISSN: 1931-390X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/aca0000360
OpenAlexW3099332800
LanguageEN
References cited6

Distortions related to eye and lip morphometry were investigated in two studies comparing photographic versus artistic profiles. In the first study, 298 artistic profiles encompassing the whole art history were compared to 300 photographic profiles. The 2 groups were compared for shape with Procrustes analysis and for size by using 8 indexes. Estimated age was inserted as covariate. The results showed that artists exaggerated eye height and width, pupil width, lip height, and width. The triangular shape of the eye view from side perspective was modified toward a more ellipsoidal shape, depicting the eye from a three-quarter and more frontal perspective. In Study 2, 13 students from the College of the Arts–School of Art were requested to draw a profile portrait of a male or female model. The eye and lip morphometric indexes of the model were compared with those extrapolated from the drawings. The results confirmed an exaggeration of eye width and height, lip width, and pupil width in artistic profiles. Additionally, the eyes shape was “frontalized.” The exaggeration of eye and lip size and the distortion in shape are interpreted and discussed according to the theory linking supernormal stimuli to aesthetic perception

Art · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Color perception and design · Face Recognition and Perception · Medicine · Optometry

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access