NetzDG on Twitter
A Social Network Analysis of Stakeholders in Public Discourse About Platform Regulation in Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21837620 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jens Pohlmann (0000-0001-6614-5358, University of Bremen, corresponding author), Caio Mello (0000-0001-7492-7237, University of Luxembourg), Karin León Henneberg (University of Bremen), Patrick Zerrer (0000-0002-8827-1336, University of Bremen) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy & Internet (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1944-2866 • E-ISSN: 1944-2866 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/poi3.70016 |
| OpenAlex | W4415221446 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 63 |
This paper examines the Twitter debate about the German anti‐hate‐speech law, the Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (NetzDG). Public discourse on this law has been contentious, with opponents cautioning against the risk of censorship and supporters emphasizing that NetzDG is necessary to protect democracy. Tweets provide valuable insights into the stakeholders, topics, and communicative practices that have shaped this discussion about platform regulation and free speech. Our research investigates the most retweeted accounts mentioning NetzDG and considers their influence on the discussion. It reveals the existence of two clusters with strong political identities: one connected to the right‐wing party Alternative für Deutschland and one linked to the liberal Freie Demokratische Partei. A third cluster consists of media and technology stakeholders. Key takeaways are the significant role played by “alternative” right‐wing media and specialized IT websites in some clusters and the central position of legal experts in all groups
Censorship · German · Politics · Public discourse · Social media · Social network analysis · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics
Doing Triangulation and Mixed Methods
Retooling Politics
Complex networks
The platform governance triangle
Measuring User Influence in Twitter
AcademictwitteR
Gephi
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Patterns of democracy? Social network analysis of parliamentary Twitter networks in 12 countries
Between Calls for Action and Narratives of Denial
When populists become popular
How Long Is a Tweet? Mapping Dynamic Conversation Networks on Twitter Using Gawk and Gephi
Affective News and Networked Publics
A New Status Index Derived from Sociometric Analysis
A mixed-method analysis of the #SugarTax debate on Twitter
Alliance of antagonism
Twitter, social movements, and claiming allies in abortion debates
The Wealth of (Occupation) Networks? Communication Patterns and Information Distribution in a Twitter Protest Network
Tweeting Apart
Of activists and gatekeepers
Hashtag feminism in a blocked context
The Influence of the Internet on the Psychosocial Predictors of Collective Action
Freedom of Speech
Converging on a nativist core? Comparing issues on the Facebook pages of the Pegida movement and the Alternative for Germany
National Politics on Twitter
Social Media and Political Agenda Setting
Public opinion and interest group influence
Topic Modeling and Characterization of Hate Speech against Immigrants on Twitter around the Emergence of a Far-Right Party in Spain
The Logic of Connective Action
The Multiple Facets of Influence
Analysis and mining of an election-based network using large-scale twitter data
Social network analysis of Twitter interactions
Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |