Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Website blocking in the European Union

Network interference from the perspective of Open Internet

Bibliographic Data

ID21837679
AuthorsVasilis Ververis (0000-0002-7681-1147, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Lucas Lasota (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Tatiana Ermakova (0000-0003-0864-3302, HTW Berlin - University of Applied Sciences), Benjamin Fabian (0000-0002-9585-1814, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau)
Year2024
Volume16
Issue1
Pages121-148
Publication date2024-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy & Internet (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1944-2866 • E-ISSN: 1944-2866
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/poi3.367
OpenAlexW4386864716
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited25

By establishing an infrastructure for monitoring and blocking networks in accordance with European Union (EU) law on preventive measures against the spread of information, EU member states have also made it easier to block websites and services and monitor information. While relevant studies have documented Internet censorship in non‐European countries, as well as the use of such infrastructures for political reasons, this study examines network interference practices such as website blocking against the backdrop of an almost complete lack of EU‐related research. Specifically, it performs and demonstrates an analysis for the total of 27 EU countries based on three different sources. They include first, tens of millions of historical network measurements collected in 2020 by Open Observatory of Network Interference volunteers from around the world; second, the publicly available blocking lists used by EU member states; and third, the reports issued by network regulators in each country from May 2020 to April 2021. Our results show that authorities issue multiple types of blocklists. Internet Service Providers limit access to different types and categories of websites and services. Such resources are sometimes blocked for unknown reasons and not included in any of the publicly available blocklists. The study concludes with the hurdles related to network measurements and the nontransparency from regulators regarding specifying website addresses in blocking activities

Business · Computer network · Computer security · European union · International trade · Internet privacy · Telecommunications · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

  • Disinformation governance and political expression

    Jungseok Yu, 유중석 유중석•Journal of Digital Media & Policy•2026

  • Data sovereignty

    Open Access•Jonathon Hutchinson, Milica Stilinovic et al.•Policy & Internet•2024

  • Sanctions and infrastructural ideologies

    Open Access•Niels Ten Oever, Clément Perarnaud et al.•Policy & Internet•2024

  • Reverse-engineering censorship in China

    Open Access•Gary King, Jennifer Pan et al.•Science•2014

  • Internet Censorship Circumvention Tools

    Open Access•Walid Al-Saqaf•Media and Communication•2016

  • Distributed, privacy-enhancing technologies in the 2017 Catalan referendum on independence

    Open Access•Marta Poblet•First Monday•2018

  • How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression

    Open Access•Gary King, Jennifer Pan et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae