Disinformation governance and political expression
Comparative accountability gaps and an extended framework for independent oversight
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22434964 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jungseok Yu (0009-0005-2516-5666, ISNI: 0000000419367830 University of Otago), 유중석 유중석 (University of Otago, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Digital Media & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2516-3523 • E-ISSN: 2516-3531 |
| Publisher | Intellect (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1386/jdmp_00205_1 |
| OpenAlex | W7168138349 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
This article examines three major institutional approaches to disinformation governance (self-regulation, co-regulation and state-centred regulation) and assesses their implications for the protection of political expression. Through a qualitative comparative analysis of the Digital Services Act (DSA) framework in the European Union, Meta’s Oversight Board and the Korea Internet Self-governance Organization (KISO) and South Korea’s state-led regulation, the study identifies recurring accountability gaps across models, using four analytical criteria: authority allocation, independence, transparency and contestability. These weaknesses have become more acute in an environment shaped by generative AI, the politicization of large platforms and the increasing use of disinformation by state actors. Building on prior scholarship and extending existing conceptual work on institutional independence, the article develops a refined framework for independent oversight suited to the contemporary information ecosystem. This framework aims to improve checks and balances, strengthen transparency and offer more credible opportunities for review than current arrangements allow. The findings highlight the need for renewed institutional design to safeguard democratic political expression amidst accelerating technological and political risks.
Accountability · Conceptual framework · Corporate governance · democratic deficit · Disinformation · Internet governance · Politics · Scholarship · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · E-Government and Public Services · Misinformation and Its Impacts
Decentring Regulation
Website blocking in the European Union
Establishing legitimacy through the media and combating fake news on Covid-19
Moderating online child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
Political Memes and Fake News Discourses on Instagram
Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research
Between two Acts
Competent Third Parties and Content Moderation on Platforms
Digital Threats to Democracy
Strengthening the accountability of independent regulatory agencies
The securitisation of fake news in Singapore
Self‐regulation Within the Regulatory State
The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism
The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance
Regulation after delegation
Fake news and democracy
Disinformation as Political Communication
Administration as usual? Revolving doors and the quiet regulation of political ethics
Freedom of political speech, hate speech and the argument from democracy
The Original Meaning of “Democracy
Industry Self‐Regulation
Self‐Regulation Versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media
| Highly cited | No |
|---|