Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Disinformation governance and political expression

Comparative accountability gaps and an extended framework for independent oversight

Bibliographic Data

ID22434964
AuthorsJungseok Yu (0009-0005-2516-5666, ISNI: 0000000419367830 University of Otago), 유중석 유중석 (University of Otago, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Digital Media & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2516-3523 • E-ISSN: 2516-3531
PublisherIntellect (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1386/jdmp_00205_1
OpenAlexW7168138349
LanguageEN
References cited33

This article examines three major institutional approaches to disinformation governance (self-regulation, co-regulation and state-centred regulation) and assesses their implications for the protection of political expression. Through a qualitative comparative analysis of the Digital Services Act (DSA) framework in the European Union, Meta’s Oversight Board and the Korea Internet Self-governance Organization (KISO) and South Korea’s state-led regulation, the study identifies recurring accountability gaps across models, using four analytical criteria: authority allocation, independence, transparency and contestability. These weaknesses have become more acute in an environment shaped by generative AI, the politicization of large platforms and the increasing use of disinformation by state actors. Building on prior scholarship and extending existing conceptual work on institutional independence, the article develops a refined framework for independent oversight suited to the contemporary information ecosystem. This framework aims to improve checks and balances, strengthen transparency and offer more credible opportunities for review than current arrangements allow. The findings highlight the need for renewed institutional design to safeguard democratic political expression amidst accelerating technological and political risks.

Accountability · Conceptual framework · Corporate governance · democratic deficit · Disinformation · Internet governance · Politics · Scholarship · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · E-Government and Public Services · Misinformation and Its Impacts

  • Decentring Regulation

    Julia Black•Current Legal Problems•2001

  • Website blocking in the European Union

    Open Access•Vasilis Ververis, Lucas Lasota et al.•Policy & Internet•2024

  • Establishing legitimacy through the media and combating fake news on Covid-19

    Yi-Chieh Lin•Chinese Journal of Communication•2022

  • Moderating online child sexual abuse material (CSAM)

    Open Access•Paul Bleakley, Elena Martellozzo et al.•European Journal of Criminology•2024

  • Political Memes and Fake News Discourses on Instagram

    Open Access•Ahmed Al-Rawi•Media and Communication•2021

  • Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research

    Open Access•Stephen Secules, Cassandra McCall et al.•Journal of Engineering Education•2021

  • Between two Acts

    Howard Lee, Terence Lee•Internet Histories•2023

  • Competent Third Parties and Content Moderation on Platforms

    Open Access•Amélie Heldt, Stephan Dreyer•Journal of Information Policy•2021

  • Digital Threats to Democracy

    Open Access•Michael L Miller, C Vaccari•The International Journal of…•2020

  • Strengthening the accountability of independent regulatory agencies

    Open Access•Giorgia Nesti•Comparative European Politics•2016

  • The securitisation of fake news in Singapore

    Open Access•Rachel Neo•International Politics•2019

  • Self‐regulation Within the Regulatory State

    Open Access•Ian Bartle, Péter Vass•Public Administration•2007

  • The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism

    Open Access•Fabrizio Gilardi•The Annals of the American…•2005

  • The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance

    Open Access•Thomas M Franck•American Journal of International…•1992

  • Regulation after delegation

    Mark Thatcher•Journal of European Public Policy•2002

  • Fake news and democracy

    Andrea Carson, Scott Wright•Australian Journal of Political…•2022

  • Disinformation as Political Communication

    Deen Freelon, Caroline Wells et al.•Political Communication•2020

  • Administration as usual? Revolving doors and the quiet regulation of political ethics

    Open Access•Lola Avril, Emilia Korkea-Aho et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Freedom of political speech, hate speech and the argument from democracy

    Open Access•Katharine Gelber•Contemporary Political Theory•2010

  • The Original Meaning of “Democracy

    Open Access•Josiah Ober•Constellations•2008

  • Industry Self‐Regulation

    Open Access•Neil Gunningham, Joseph Rees•Law & Policy•1997

  • Self‐Regulation Versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies

    Open Access•Darren Sinclair•Law & Policy•1997

  • Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

    Open Access•Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media

    Lisa M Kruse, Dawn R Norris et al.•Sociological Quarterly•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae