Beyond abortion
Impacts of the expanded global gag rule in Kenya, Madagascar and Nepal
Bibliographic Data
Since 1984, Republican administrations in the US have enacted the global gag rule (GGR), which prohibits non-US-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs) from providing, referring for, or counselling on abortion as a method of family planning, or advocating for the liberalisation of abortion laws, as a condition for receiving certain categories of US Global Health Assistance. Versions of the GGR implemented before 2017 applied to US Family Planning Assistance only, but the Trump administration expanded the policy’s reach by applying it to nearly all types of Global Health Assistance. Documentation of the policy’s harms in the peer-reviewed and grey literature has grown considerably in recent years, however few cross-country analyses exist. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of the GGR’s impacts across three countries with distinct abortion laws: Kenya, Madagascar and Nepal. We conducted 479 in-depth qualitative interviews between August 2018 and March 2020. Participants included representatives of Ministries of Health and NGOs that did and did not certify the GGR, providers of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services at public and private facilities, community health workers, and contraceptive clients. We observed greater breakdown of NGO coordination and chilling effects in countries where abortion is legal and there is a sizeable community of non-US-based NGOs working on SRH. However, we found that the GGR fractured SRH service delivery in all countries, irrespective of the legal status of abortion. Contraceptive service availability, accessibility and training for providers were particularly damaged. Further, this analysis makes clear that the GGR has substantial and deleterious effects on public sector infrastructure for SRH in addition to NGOs
Abortion · Business · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Family planning · Liberalization · Political science · Population · Public health · Qualitative research · Reproductive health · Reproductive rights · Research methodology · Service provider · Social science · Sociology · Unsafe abortion · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Global Maternal and Child Health · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Reproductive Health and Contraception
Promoting sexual and reproductive health in development and governance priorities for youth in Nepal
US Presidential Party switches are mirrored in global maternal mortality
Can audit and feedback improve health service readiness and delivery outcomes in a low-resource setting? Effectiveness results of the Ideas strategy from central Mozambique
Two decades of research capacity strengthening and reciprocal learning on sexual and reproductive health in East Africa – a point of (no) return
Abortion Within Reason or Right
| Citations per year | 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |