Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

US Presidential Party switches are mirrored in global maternal mortality

Bibliographic Data

ID21880447
AuthorsSonia Bhalotra (0000-0001-8634-8822, University of Warwick), Damian Clarke (0009-0000-9113-2188, University of Exeter), Manuel Fernández Sierra (0000-0002-6447-6337, Universidad de los Andes), Hanna Mühlrad (0000-0001-8618-7408, Karolinska Institutet)
Year2026
Volume11
Issue3
Pagese020223
Publication date2026-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020223
PMID41876140
OpenAlexW7140197190
LanguageEN
References cited20

In this observational study, we provide estimates of the impact on the maternal mortality ratio of swings in US aid for family planning and reproductive health driven by changes in the implementation of the Mexico City Policy—first introduced as the US Policy on Population Assistance under the Reagan administration in 1984 and often referred to as the Global Gag Rule (GGR). The policy prohibits US foreign assistance for family planning to overseas non-governmental organisations that provide, make referrals to or promote abortion-related services or information, even when financed through non-US funds. Since first implemented by President Reagan in 1984, the GGR has been enacted under every Republican president and revoked under every Democrat. The policy was tightened under President Trump in his first presidency in 2017 and expanded to apply to all US global health assistance. Using data for the period 1985–2023, covering 150 countries worldwide and using a quasi-experimental study design, we estimate that a switch from a Democratic to a Republican administration, for a country with above median reliance on US family planning aid, is associated with an additional 44.7 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births—an increase of 10.5%. This erodes roughly one-fifth of the average worldwide decline in maternal mortality achieved since 1985. Additionally, our findings offer suggestive evidence of potential mechanisms including a reduction in contraceptive use, an increase in unmet need for contraception and a decrease in the proportion of births attended by skilled health workers

Democracy · Family planning · Global health · Population · Presidency · Presidential system · Public health · Reproductive health · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Health Policy

  • Global causes of maternal death

    Open Access•Lale Say, Doris Chou et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2014

  • Disease and Development

    Catherine Marshall, H Bleakley•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2007

  • Beyond abortion

    Open Access•Emily Maistrellis, Kenneth Juma et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • The influence of the expanded Global Gag Rule on Malawi’s sexual and reproductive health and rights landscape

    Open Access•Aishwarya Iyer, Samantha M Luffy et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States

    Diana Greene Foster, M Antonia Biggs et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2022

  • Disease and Development

    Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson•Journal of Political Economy•2007

  • Contraceptive Supply and Fertility Outcomes

    Kelly Jones, Kelly M Jones•Economic Development and Cultural…•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae