Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Respectful care an added extra

A grounded theory study exploring intrapartum experiences in Zambia and Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID21879645
AuthorsTina Lavender (0000-0003-1473-4956, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, corresponding author), Carol Bedwell (0000-0001-8031-7793, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Chowa Tembo Kasengele (Ministry of Health), Debora Kimaro (Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences), Flora Kuzenza (Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences), Kutemba Lyangenda (Ministry of Health), Tracey A Mills (0000-0002-2183-7999, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine), Livuka Nsemwa (0000-0003-3433-4685, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences), Happiness Shayo (Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences), Khuzuet Tuwele (Ministry of Health), Sabina Wakasiaka (0000-0002-4417-7786, University of Nairobi), Rose Laisser (0000-0002-2636-0843, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences)
Year2021
Volume6
Issue4
Pagese004725
Publication date2021-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004725
PMID33926891
OpenAlexW3157704726
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited25

Background Quality of maternal and newborn care is integral to positive clinical, social and psychological outcomes. Respectful care is an important component of this but is suboptimum in many low-income settings. A renewed energy among health professionals and academics is driving an international agenda to eradicate disrespectful health facility care around the globe. However, few studies have explored respectful care from different vantage points. Methods We used Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory methodology to explore intrapartum experiences in Tanzania and Zambia. In-depth interviews were conducted with 98 participants (48 women, 18 partners, 21 health-providers and 11 key stakeholders), resulting in data saturation. Analysis involved constant comparison, comprising three stages of coding: open, axial and selective. The process involved application of memos, reflexivity and positionality. Results Findings demonstrated that direct and indirect social discrimination led to inequity of care. Health-providers were believed to display manipulative behaviours to orchestrate situations for their own or the woman’s benefit, and were often caring against the odds , in challenging environments. Emergent categories were related to the core category: respectful care, an added extra , which reflects the notion that women did not always expect or receive respectful care, and tolerated poor experiences to obtain services believed to benefit them or their babies. Respectful care was not seen as a component of good quality care, but a luxury that only some receive. Conclusion Both quality of care and respectful care were valued but were not viewed as mutually inclusive. Good quality treatment (transactional care) was often juxtaposed with disrespectful care; with relational care having a lower status among women and healthcare providers. To readdress the balance, respectful care should be a predominant theme in training programmes, policies and audits. Women’s and health-provider voices are pivotal to the development of such interventions

Grounded theory · Health care · Political science · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Sociology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing education and management · Psychology

  • Experiences and feasibility of implementing and using smiley survey terminals as a research tool at six maternity care facilities in Malawi and Tanzania

    Open Access•Bob Faque, Livuka Nsemwa et al.•International Journal of Social…•2026

  • Cross sectional survey of maternal and newborn quality of care in Niger

    Open Access•Alexandre Quach, Barbara Madaj et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  • Basics of qualitative research

    Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin et al.•Basics of qualitative research•2008

  • Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision

    Open Access•Özge Tunçalp, Ӧ Tunçalp et al.•BJOG An International Journal of…•2015

  • Stillbirths

    Open Access•Joy Elizabeth Lawn, Hannah Blencowe et al.•The Lancet•2016

  • Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Meghan A Bohren, Erin C Hunter et al.•Reproductive Health•2014

  • Why Do Women Not Use Antenatal Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

    Open Access•Kenneth Finlayson, Kenny Finlayson et al.•PLoS Medicine•2013

  • The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally

    Open Access•Meghan A Bohren, Joshua P Vogel et al.•PLoS Medicine•2015

  • Symbolic Interactionism

    Herbert Blumer•Symbolic Interactionism•1986

  • HIV/Aids and maternity care in Kenya

    Janet M Turan, Suellen Miller et al.•AIDS Care•2008

  • Perceptions of Quality of Reproductive Care Services in Bolivia

    Deborah E Bender, Ana Santander et al.•Health Care For Women International•2008

  • A critical interpretive synthesis of informal payments in maternal health care

    Open Access•Marta Schaaf, Stephanie M Topp•Health Policy and Planning•2019

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae