Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Policy dialogue as a collaborative tool for multistakeholder health governance

A scoping study

Bibliographic Data

ID21880125
AuthorsEmilie Robert (0000-0002-2260-1873, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, corresponding author), Dheepa Rajan (0000-0001-8733-0560, World Health Organization), Kira Koch (0000-0002-3592-0574, World Health Organization), Alyssa Muggleworth Weaver (World Health Organization), Denis Porignon (0000-0002-0843-5696, World Health Organization), Valery Ridde (0000-0001-9299-8266, Université Paris Cité)
Year2020
Volume4
IssueSuppl 7
Pagese002161
Publication date2020-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002161
PMID32816823
OpenAlexW3017202413
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited46

INTRODUCTION: Health system governance is the cornerstone of performant, equitable and sustainable health systems aiming towards universal health coverage. Global health actors have increasingly been using policy dialogue (PD) as a governance tool to engage with both state and non-state stakeholders. Despite attempts to frame PD practices, it remains a catch-all term for both health systems professionals and researchers. METHOD: We conducted a scoping study on PD. We identified 25 articles published in English between 1985 and 2017 and 10 grey literature publications. The analysis was guided by the following questions: (1) How do the authors define PD? (2) What do we learn about PD practices and implementation factors? (3) What are the specificities of PD in low-income and middle-income countries? RESULTS: The analysis highlighted three definitions of policy dialogue: a knowledge exchange and translation platform, a mode of governance and an instrument for negotiating international development aid. Success factors include the participants' continued and sustained engagement throughout all the relevant stages, their ability to make a constructive contribution to the discussions while being truly representative of their organisation and their high interest and stake in the subject. Prerequisites to ensuring that participants remained engaged were a clear process, a shared understanding of the goals at all levels of the PD and a PD approach consistent with the PD objective. In the context of development aid, the main challenges lie in the balance of power between stakeholders, the organisational or technical capacity of recipient country stakeholders to drive or contribute effectively to the PD processes and the increasingly technocratic nature of PD. CONCLUSION: PD requires a high level of collaborative governance expertise and needs constant, although not necessarily high, financial support. These conditions are crucial to make it a real driver of health system reform in countries' paths towards universal health coverage

Business · Collaborative governance · Corporate governance · Health services research · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Global Maternal and Child Health · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Health Policy

  • Policy dialogue

    Open Access•Andi Hermansyah, Azhari Aziz Samudra et al.•Journal of Infrastructure Policy…•2024

  • Priority setting for non-communicable disease prevention - Co-producing a regulatory agenda informing novel codes of practice in Australia

    Open Access•Melanie Heenan, Jan et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2023

  • Societal Impact in a Turbulent World

    Open Access•Sarah Dorr, Birthe Einen et al.•International Studies Perspectives•2025

  • Shaping Policy on Chronic Diseases through National Policy Dialogs in CHRODIS PLUS

    Open Access•Dorota Sienkiewicz, Alison Maassen et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • From fragility to resilience

    Open Access•Elizabeth Lugten, Rachel Marcus et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Public–private dialogue

    Open Access•Barbara O’Hanlon, B OHanlon et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Expanding access to sexual and reproductive health and rights through evidence-based policy dialogue

    Open Access•Ulrika Rehnstrom Loi, Amy Coates et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Use of Results-Oriented Monitoring tools to enhance global health accountability

    Open Access•Maria Roura, Eva Capa et al.•BMJ Global Health•2024

  • Using the multiple streams model to elicit an initial programme theory

    Open Access•Monika Martens, J Van Olmen et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • A method for testing health system resilience

    Open Access•Julia Zimmermann, Philip Haywood et al.•Health Policy•2026

  • A systematic process to formulate quality lessons learned about hospital resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Roula Haddad, Christian Dagenais et al.•Global Health Action•2025

  • Rameses publication standards

    Open Access•Geoff Wong, Trish Greenhalgh et al.•BMC Medicine•2013

  • The Oxford Handbook of Governance

    Dāwid Lēwî-Faur, David Levi-Faur•Oxford handbook of governance•2012

  • Dictionnaire des politiques publiques

    Patrick Le Galès•Dictionnaire des politiques…•2014

  • Dictionnaire des politiques publiques

    Laurie Boussaguet, Sophie Jacquot et al.•Dictionnaire des politiques…•2010

  • Politicization and expertise

    Peter Scholten, Stijn Verbeek•Science and Public Policy•2015

  • Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy

    Russo M, Robert Geyer et al.•Handbook on Complexity and Public…•2015

  • Towards a framework for multisector and multilevel collaboration

    Open Access•Pinky Mahlangu, Jane Goudge et al.•Global Health Action•2019

  • Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy

    Open Access•John N Lavis, Jennifer A Boyko et al.•BMC Public Health•2014

  • Frameworks to assess health systems governance

    Open Access•Thidar Pyone, Helen Smith et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • Evidence-based Policy

    Open Access•Ray Pawson•Evaluation•2002

  • From Mar del Plata to Kyoto

    Open Access•Asit K Biswas•Global Environmental Change•2004

  • The emergence of global attention to health systems strengthening

    Open Access•Tamara Hafner, Joseph Shiffman•Health Policy and Planning•2013

  • Structural Adjustment and Policy Dialogue

    Open Access•Philip Daniel•IDS Bulletin•1986

  • The Great Divide? Donor perceptions of budget support, eligibility and policy dialogue

    Nadia Molenaers•Third World Quarterly•2012

  • Policy reforms in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Louise G White•Studies in Comparative…•1990

  • Citizen Participation in Decision Making

    Open Access•Renee A Irvin, John Stansbury•Public Administration Review•2004

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Scoping studies

    Hilary Arksey, Lisa O’malley•International Journal of Social…•2005

  • Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making

    Open Access•Jennifer A Boyko, Jennifer Boyko et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

Citations per year1.83
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae