Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Global disparities in public health guidance for the use of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy

Bibliographic Data

ID21880240
AuthorsEleonor Zavala (0000-0002-8457-0259, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Carleigh Krubiner (0000-0003-1647-2355, Center for Global Development), Carleigh B Krubiner (Center for Global Development), Elana Jaffe Brotkin (0000-0003-1917-2278, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Elana F Jaffe (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Andrew Nicklin (Johns Hopkins University), Rachel Gur-Arie (0000-0002-0868-7682, Johns Hopkins University), Chizoba Wonodi (0000-0002-2793-9216, Johns Hopkins University), Ruth Faden (0009-0001-8601-8783, Johns Hopkins University), Ruth R Faden (Johns Hopkins University), Ruth A Karron (0000-0002-4448-4946, Johns Hopkins University)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue2
Pagese007730
Publication date2022-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007730
PMID35210309
OpenAlexW4213434575
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited21

INTRODUCTION: Gaps in information about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy have led to substantial global variation in public health guidance regarding the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy over the course of the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted systematic screenings of public health authorities' websites across 224 countries and territories every 3 weeks to track the development of policies on COVID-19 vaccine use in pregnancy. Policies were categorised using a 1-5 permissiveness scale, with 1 indicating policies that recommended use, and 5 indicating policies that recommended against use. RESULTS: As of 30 September 2021, 176 countries/territories had issued explicit guidance on COVID-19 vaccine use in pregnancy, with 38% recommending use, 28% permitting use, 15% permitting use with qualifications, 2% not recommending but with exceptions, and 17% not recommending use whatsoever. This represented a significant shift from May 2021, when only 6% of countries/territories with such policies recommended the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy (p<0.001). However, no policy positions could be found for 21% of all countries and territories, the vast majority being low and middle income. Policy positions also varied widely by vaccine product, with Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines being most commonly recommended or permitted. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the evolution of policies regarding COVID-19 vaccine use in pregnancy over a 5-month period in 2021, the role of pregnancy-specific data in shaping these policies and how inequities in access for pregnant people persist, both within countries and globally

Disease · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Geography · Global health · Pandemic · Political science · Pregnancy · Public health · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Medicine · Nursing · SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

  • Sars-CoV-2 seroprevalence among Beninese pregnant women in the third year of the pandemic

    Open Access•Antía Figueroa-Romero, Aurore Atchadé et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • A qualitative inquiry in understanding trusted media sources to reduce vaccine hesitancy among Kenyans

    Open Access•Berhaun Fesshaye, Clarice Lee et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2023

  • Associations of Covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy with adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes

    Open Access•Cailin Ding, Yakun Liu et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Assessing the role of Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme as a tool for addressing inequality in access to medications and allocation of public funds for pregnant women

    Open Access•Hannah Jackson, Luke E Grzeskowiak et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy

    Open Access•Terra Manca, K A Top et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2023

  • Gender equity and Covid-19 vaccine policies for pregnant people

    Open Access•Eleonor Zavala, Elizabeth Doggett et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2025

  • Vaccines protect both you and your newborn

    Open Access•Terra Manca•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against Sars-CoV-2 infections and Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel

    Open Access•Eric J Haas, Frederick J Angulo et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy

    Open Access•John Allotey, Silvia Fernandez et al.•BMJ•2020

Unique citing works7
Citations per year2,33
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae