A qualitative inquiry in understanding trusted media sources to reduce vaccine hesitancy among Kenyans
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22092474 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Berhaun Fesshaye (0000-0003-2868-4187, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Clarice Lee (0000-0001-5083-8934, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Alicia M Paul (0000-0003-2845-7654, Johns Hopkins University), Eleonor Zavala (0000-0002-8457-0259, Johns Hopkins University), Prachi Singh (0000-0001-9890-6051, Johns Hopkins University), Ruth A Karron (0000-0002-4448-4946, Johns Hopkins University), Rupali J Limaye (0000-0002-3883-9720, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2023.995538 |
| OpenAlex | W4318044535 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 34 |
COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Kenya has been challenged by both the supply of and demand for vaccines. With a third of the adult population classifying as vaccine hesitant, reaching vaccination targets requires an understanding of how people make decisions regarding vaccines. Globally, pregnant and lactating women have especially low uptake rates, which could be attributed to the “infodemic,” or constant rush of new information, as this group is vulnerable to misinformation and uncertainty. While presentation of COVID-19 vaccines in the media allows for easy access, these sources are also susceptible to misinformation. Negative and unfounded claims surrounding SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccines contribute to vaccine hesitancy. Given the influence that the media may have on people's attitudes toward vaccines, this study examines the relationship between the media and the vaccine decision-making process among pregnant and lactating women, healthcare workers, community members (male relatives, male neighbors, and gatekeepers), and policymakers in Kenya. Data were collected through in-depth interviews in urban and rural counties in Kenya to understand how media information was utilized and consumed. While healthcare workers were the most frequently cited information source for pregnant and lactating women, other healthcare workers, and community members, findings also show that the media (traditional, social, and Internet) is an important source for obtaining COVID-19 information for these groups. Policymakers obtained their information most frequently from traditional media. Ensuring that information circulating throughout these media channels is accurate and accessible is vital to reduce vaccine hesitancy and ultimately, meet COVID-19 vaccination goals in Kenya
Business · Disease · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Misinformation · Pandemic · Political science · Population · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social media · Sociology · Vaccination · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Immunology
Leveraging media and health communication strategies to overcome the Covid-19 infodemic
Understanding Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy
Global disparities in public health guidance for the use of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy
Covid-19 impacts on coastal communities in Kenya
Vaccine Willingness and Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Women’s Perinatal Experiences and Practices—A Multinational, Cross-Sectional Study Covering the First Wave of the Pandemic
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |