Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Is there a role for RDTs as we live with Covid-19? An assessment of different strategies

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21880576
AutoresGabrielle Bonnet (0000-0002-3539-5001, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, autor de correspondencia), Anna Vassall (0000-0002-2911-1375, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Mark Jit (0000-0001-6658-8255, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
Año2023
Volumen8
Número1
Páginase010690
Fecha de publicación2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
EditorialBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010690
PMID36657797
OpenAlexW4317500302
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas22

INTRODUCTION: By 2022, high levels of past COVID-19 infections, combined with substantial levels of vaccination and the development of Omicron, have shifted country strategies towards burden reduction policies. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)) could contribute to these policies by helping rapidly detect, isolate and/or treat infections in different settings. However, the evidence to inform RDT policy choices in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. METHOD: We provide an overview of the potential impact of several RDT use cases (surveillance; testing, tracing and isolation without and with surveillance; hospital-based screening to reduce nosocomial COVID-19; and testing to enable earlier/expanded treatment) for a range of country settings. We use conceptual models and literature review to identify which use cases are likely to bring benefits and how these may change with outbreak characteristics. Impacts are measured through multiple outcomes related to gaining time, reducing the burden on the health system and reducing deaths. RESULTS: In an optimal scenario in terms of resources and capacity and with baseline parameters, we find marginal time gains of 4 days or more through surveillance and testing tracing and isolation with surveillance, a reduction in peak intensive care unit (ICU) or ICU admissions by 5% or more (hospital-based screening; testing, tracing and isolation) and reductions in COVID-19 deaths by over 6% (hospital-based screening; test and treat). Time gains may be used to strengthen ICU capacity and/or boost vulnerable individuals, though only a small minority of at-risk individuals could be reached in the time available. The impact of RDTs declines with lower country resources and capacity, more transmissible or immune-escaping variants and reduced test sensitivity. CONCLUSION: RDTs alone are unlikely to dramatically reduce the burden of COVID-19 in LMICs, though they may have an important role alongside other interventions such as vaccination, therapeutic drugs, improved healthcare capacity and non-pharmaceutical measures

Contact tracing · Diagnostic test · Disease · Environmental health · Intensive care medicine · Outbreak · Pandemic · Vaccination · Medicine · Respiratory viral infections research · SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · Emergency Medicine · Virology

  • Provider costs of professional Covid-19 rapid antigen testing in low-income settings

    Open Access•Collin Mangenah, Lucky G Ngwira et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic

    Open Access•Neil M Ferguson, Derek A T Cummings et al.•Nature•2006

  • Stark choices

    Open Access•Sergio Torres‐rueda, Stuart Sweeney et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae