On Concepts of Descent and Descent Groups
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2188159 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harry W Basehart, Harold W Scheffler |
| Year | 1967 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 5, Part 1 |
| Pages | 505-509 |
| Publication date | 1967-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Current Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0011-3204 • E-ISSN: 1537-5382 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/200837 |
| OpenAlex | W2015327483 |
| Language | EN |
This article examines and clarifies the concepts of descent and descent groups, arguing for a more precise and consistent usage of these terms in anthropological analysis. Basehart and Scheffler critique the prevailing conflation of descent with various social processes like inheritance, succession, and group formation. They emphasize that descent is fundamentally a jural principle based on stipulated genealogical connections, which may or may not align with biological relationships. The authors distinguish between cognatic and unilineal descent, outlining the different structural implications of each. They also differentiate between descent groups, which are based on demonstrated descent, and other kinds of social groups that may utilize descent as a principle of organization but do not require genealogical proof of membership. The article concludes by advocating for a more rigorous application of descent theory, urging anthropologists to carefully distinguish between descent as a jural rule and its varied social manifestations
African descent · Archaeology · Descent (aeronautics · Foundation (evidence · Geography · Library science · Sociology · Anthropology · Computer Science · History · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |