Expanding on the multidisciplinary stakeholder framework to minimize harms for problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies
Commentary on: Problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies: A stakeholder framework to minimize harms (Swanton et al., 2019)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21881969 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jing Shi (0000-0001-7156-8128, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Mark van der Maas (0000-0001-9606-0187, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Nigel E Turner (0000-0002-1035-2064, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), Marc N Potenza (0000-0002-6323-1354, Yale University) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 886-897 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Addictions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2062-5871 • E-ISSN: 2063-5303 |
| Publisher | Akademiai Kiado Zrt. (PUBLISHER • HU) |
| DOI | 10.1556/2006.2020.00096 |
| PMID | 33372914 |
| OpenAlex | W3115432760 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 48 |
As new types of problematic behaviors and new forms of online risk-taking emerge, forming collaborative relationships while understanding complexities of motivations may help to promote harm reduction and intervention. While it may be too early to form a stakeholder framework without first conceptually understanding the problematic behaviors involved, we attempt to build upon a proposed multidisciplinary stakeholder framework to minimize harms for problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies. We propose an expansion of roles for individual stakeholders and an expansion of proposed roles for family stakeholders to include partner/spouses, others living in the household, and/or those with close relationships with individuals who are experiencing problems. Empowering individuals who use emerging technologies through participatory action research and knowledge translation/dissemination may lead to improvements in the quality of research and a greater impact on policy and practice. Also, we discuss benefits of industry self-regulation and collaboration on data-sharing practices. We recommend approaches to promote global collaboration with a larger group of relevant stakeholders (including but not limited to individual consumers of technology, families, communities, treatment and welfare providers, researchers, industries, and governments) to address protection of vulnerable populations and reduce harms for users of rapidly advancing technologies
Business · Emerging technologies · Harm · Knowledge management · Multidisciplinary approach · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Health Policy Implementation Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions
High-Frequency Pornography Use May Not Always Be Problematic
Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking
A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder
From best evidence to best practice
Gaming disorder
The Impact of Substance Use Disorders on Families and Children
Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”
Problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies
Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal
Motivations for Play in Online Games
Motivators for Change and Barriers to Help-Seeking in Australian Problem Gamblers
Stakeholders’ Consensus on Strategies for Self- and Other-Regulation of Video Game Play
Commentary on
The Future of Gaming Disorder Research and Player Protection
Critiquing the Reno Model I-IV International Influence on Regulators and Governments (2004–2015)— the Distorted Reality of “Responsible Gambling”
From self-regulation to regulation – An analysis of gambling policy reform in Finland
Tackling the overdose crisis
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |