Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making Systemic Risk Assessments Work

How the DSA Creates a Virtuous Loop to Address the Societal Harms of Content Moderation

Bibliographic Data

ID21971610
AuthorsNiklas Eder (0000-0001-6433-3734, Institute for Legal Studies, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume25
Issue7
Pages1197-1218
Publication date2024-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGerman Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2071-8322 • E-ISSN: 2071-8322
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/glj.2024.24
OpenAlexW4402609545
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) introduces a new regulatory approach to address the societal harms of online platforms: Systemic risk assessments. While a core component of the DSA, the regulation only outlines the standards and processes governing systemic risk assessments in broad strokes. It remains unclear what these systemic risk assesments will entail in practice. This Article develops a proposal of how systemic risk assessments should be implemented. It situates systemic risk assessments as a critical step toward platform accountability as they address societal harms, while existing approaches, such as remedy mechanisms, only protect user rights. Engaging with intangible harms and regulating speech and public discourse, risk assessments also entail significant challenges. Conventional reference points for content moderation regulation, such as terms and conditions, contractual freedom, fundamental rights and expertise, do not provide practical and legitimate bases to concretize risk assessment obligations. Public actors, such as the European Commission, should refrain from defining substantive standards, too, as they are directly bound by freedom of expression guarantees. Instead, the Article argues, the Commission should foster a procedural framework, a “virtuous loop,” which empowers civil society and allows it to specify and refine the standards governing systemic risks over time. Developing this framework, the Article explains how systemic risk assessment can fix “multistakeholderism,” and “multistakeholderism,” in turn, can help make systemic risk assessments work

Business · Economics · Moderation · Virtuous circle and vicious circle · Engineering · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Psychology · Social Psychology · Mechanical Engineering

  • Very large, largely silent

    Open Access•Carlotta Rigotti, Nicola Döring et al.•Porn Studies•2026

  • From content flows to legitimacy competition

    Open Access•Qiwei Huang•Frontiers in Communication•2026

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae