Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The German “Verständigung” and Consensual Elements in German Criminal Trials

Bibliographic Data

ID21971619
AuthorsMatthias Jahn (0000-0002-0971-1672, Goethe University Frankfurt), Charlotte Schmitt-Leonardy (Goethe University Frankfurt)
Year2020
Volume21
Issue6
Pages1134-1148
Publication date2020-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGerman Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2071-8322 • E-ISSN: 2071-8322
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/glj.2020.69
OpenAlexW3086557341
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

Negotiated agreements in criminal proceedings have often been regarded as the embodiment of a negative wider trend towards the informalization of the criminal procedure, and have—especially in Germany—long been the subject of vivid controversies. A criminal proceeding in the traditional sense aims to establish the truth ex officio , which is achieved by means of a comprehensive inquiry into the facts conducted by the court during the trial, followed by a sentence that appropriately reflects the individual guilt of the defendant, which can then, in turn, achieve the procedural objective of “justice.” A streamlining of the extensive inquiry into the facts that the court would normally have to conduct via the consensual process of negotiation does not, a priori , fit the mold of a criminal procedure in the aforementioned sense. At the same time, the consensual termination of criminal proceedings—which also includes other forms of termination of the proceeding besides the concept of Verständigung, which occur by means of a preferment of public charges—is, in fact, more prevalent in practice these days than judgments rendered in adversarial trials are. Our Article focuses on the reasons why this stark contrast between legal doctrine and reality came to pass and which aspects of the implementation of the concept of consensus into the German law of criminal procedure still seem problematic

Adversarial system · Criminal justice · Criminal procedure · Doctrine · German · Negotiation · Political science · Sentence · Computer Science · Criminal Law and Evidence · Criminal Law and Policy · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms

    Open Access•D Czerwińska•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2022

  • The German “Verständigung” and Consensual Elements in German Criminal Trials

    Open Access•Matthias Jahn, Charlotte Schmitt-Leonardy•German Law Journal•2020

  • The role of the judge in the European plea bargaining procedures

    Open Access•Ali Emrah Bozbayındır•The International Journal of…•2023

  • The German “Verständigung” and Consensual Elements in German Criminal Trials

    Open Access•Matthias Jahn, Charlotte Schmitt-Leonardy•German Law Journal•2020

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2023 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae