Reconceptualizing Consumer Responsibility

From Rosters to Philosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID21987328
AuthorsSue L T Mcgregor (0000-0002-4392-9608, Mount Saint Vincent University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume16
Issue2
Pages84-105
Publication date2025-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueETHICS IN PROGRESS (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2084-9257 • E-ISSN: 2084-9257
PublisherAdam Mickiewicz University Poznan (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14746/eip.2025.2.4
OpenAlexW7117971185
LanguageEN
References cited30

Conceptual papers reflect a researcher’s theoretical thoughts and philosophical speculations about a topic and are especially useful for generating ideas that incentivize theory development. This conceptual paper shares a philosophical reconceptualization of consumer responsibility, which people traditionally approach using rosters of corresponding responsibilities and rights. After profiling rosters from both the United Nations and Consumers International, the consumer responsibility phenomenon was reconceptualized through three philosophical queries: (a) what is it to be responsible (moral reasoning, feelings, or virtue/character trait); (b) what is a person responsible for (past and future orientation — retrospection and prospection); and (c) before whom is someone responsible (self-attribution versus diffusion)? Future researchers are encouraged to use this new conceptual framework to study and theorize the different ways people might philosophically understand being responsible consumers

Business ethics · Conceptual framework · Conceptual model · Phenomenon · Philosophical methodology · Ethics in Business and Education · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Organic Food and Agriculture

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access