Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Presentation of Socio-Scientific Subjects to Students by Using Argumentation Process

Bibliographic Data

ID21998764
AuthorsHamdi KARAKAŞ (0000-0001-9209-4128, Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume8
Issue23
Pages409-427
Publication date2020-09-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAvrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2147-2610 • E-ISSN: 2147-2610
PublisherAvrasya Uluslararas脹 Arast脹rmalar Dergisi (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.33692/avrasyad.794827
OpenAlexW3087857783
LanguageEN
References cited30

Real life problems in the socio-scientific structure are the issues that need to be considered and discussed from different perspectives in terms of their scientific aspect, the environment and the social structure that they affect. Individuals who gain experience with real-life knowledge can better adapt their knowledge to the problems they may encounter in daily life. The process of argumentation (scientific discussion) in the structuring of scientific knowledge and development of mental activities comes to the forefront in recent educational studies. This process begins with questioning of the claims made or defended by others and continues with the students' developing their own arguments, defending them and refuting counter claims. In this context, as the main aim of the study, the importance of presenting socio-scientific subjects to the students by utilizing argumentation process in science courses was investigated. The characteristic of the argumentation process is that individuals tend to support or refute arguments regarding the situations they are faced with. Thus, in the process of producing arguments, the socio-scientific situation is evaluated, examined and the problems encountered can be seen critically from someone else's point of view. Discussion of the dichotomous structure, inherent in socio-scientific topics, together with argumentation process will lead students to think actively, and they will interpret the events, develop arguments and produce applicable ideas

Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Political science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Structuring · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • TAPping into argumentation

    Open Access•Sibel Erduran, Shirley Simon et al.•Science Education•2004

  • Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms

    Open Access•Katherine L Mcneill, Diane Silva Pimentel•Science Education•2010

  • Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio‐scientific issues into the science curriculum

    Hyunju Lee, Fouad Abd‐el‐khalick et al.•Canadian Journal of Science…•2006

  • Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education

    Richard A Duschl, Jonathan Osborne•Studies in Science Education•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae