Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Communicating Contested Science in a Polarized World

Scientists’ Views on Science Communication

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22006262
AutoresKatrine Donois (0000-0002-0003-1881, Anglia Ruskin University, autor correspondente), Lewis Goodings (0009-0009-3439-4435, Anglia Ruskin University), Esben W Carey (0009-0008-1573-0854, Leeds Beckett University)
Ano2026
Volume16
Fascículo1
Data de publicação2026-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/21582440261417757
OpenAlexW7128792099
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas70

This qualitative study investigates scientists’ views on and experiences of collaborating with journalists and engaging in science communication (SciCom) about contested science issues, such as climate change, vaccines, and genetically modified organisms. 27 interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis of the data revealed five themes. These themes highlight the perceived benefits and challenges (concerns) of engaging in SciCom and working with journalists, as well as perspectives on SciCom training, motivations, and the public (audiences). SciCom plays a significant role in fighting misinformation. However, understanding scientists’ experiences and views is needed before more effective SciCom interventions can be formulated and SciCom engagement can be increased

Discourse analysis · Psychological intervention · Public awareness of science · Public engagement · Qualitative research · Science communication · Thematic analysis · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Science Education and Perceptions

  • Complete Science Communication

    Ryan C Fortenberry•Complete Science Communication•2018

  • Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication

    Open Access•Kathleen M Rose, Ezra M Markowitz et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Science communication as political communication

    Open Access•Dietram A Scheufele•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Communicating science in politicized environments

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Jessica L Johnson, Donna Adkins et al.•American Journal of Pharmaceutical…•2020

  • Thematic Analysis

    G Terry, Nikki Hayfield et al.•The Sage Handbook of Qualitative…•2017

  • Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches

    Open Access•Braun, Victoria Clarke•Counselling and Psychotherapy…•2021

  • Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of Covid-19

    Open Access•Bernadette Hyland, John Gardner et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • Rethinking Science Communication Education and Training

    Open Access•Birte Fähnrich, Clare Wilkinson et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • A Systematic Map of Inclusion, Equity and Diversity in Science Communication Research

    Open Access•Karina Judd, Meghan Mckinnon et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • Reasoning on Controversial Science Issues in Science Education and Science Communication

    Open Access•Anna Beniermann, Laurens Mecklenburg et al.•Education Sciences•2021

  • Global Social Responsibility and the Internationalisation of Higher Education for Society

    Open Access•Elspeth Jones, Betty Leask et al.•Journal of Studies in International…•2021

  • A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis

    Open Access•David Byrne•Quality & Quantity•2022

  • Feeling Left Out

    Open Access•Christian Humm, Philipp Schrögel et al.•Media and Communication•2020

  • Are You Threatening Me? Identity Threat, Resistance to Persuasion, and Boomerang Effects in Environmental Communication

    Yanni Ma, Jay D Hmielowski•Environmental Communication•2022

  • The nature and origins of political polarization over science

    Open Access•Roderik Rekker•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • Mapping mental models of science communication

    Open Access•Sabrina Heike Kessler, Mike S Schäfer et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • “The chilling effect”

    Open Access•Daniel Nölleke, Birte Leonhardt et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Quantifying scientific jargon

    Open Access•Shannon D Willoughby, Keith Johnson et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • The lure of rationality

    Open Access•Molly Simis, Molly J Simis et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Boomerang Effects in Science Communication

    Open Access•P Sol Hart, Erik C Nisbet•Communication Research•2011

  • Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Psychology•2022

  • To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2021

  • Responsibility and science communication

    Open Access•Maria Loroño-Leturiondo, Sarah R Davies•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Erasure of labour

    Open Access•Christine Campbell, Carol Owens et al.•Feminist Media Studies•2021

  • Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses

    Open Access•Andrew J B Fugard, Henry W W Potts•International Journal of Social…•2015

  • The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology

    Open Access•Sue Wilkinson•Women s Studies International Forum•1988

  • Toward a New Strategic Public Health Science for Policy, Practice, Impact, and Health Equity

    Rebecca Bunnell, Juliet Ryan et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2021

  • La formation d'une institution scientifique

    Jean-Pierre Vittu•Journal des savants•2002

  • Starting science in the vernacular. Notes on some early issues of the Philosophical Transactions and the Journal des Sçavans, 1665-1700

    Open Access•David Banks•ASp•2009

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Assessment by Audiences Shows Little Effect of Science Communication Training

    Open Access•Margaret A Rubega, Kevin R Burgio et al.•Science Communication•2021

  • Correcting Misinformation About Neuroscience via Social Media

    Open Access•Ciarra N Smith, Holli H Seitz•Science Communication•2019

  • Science Communication Training in North America

    Open Access•Anthony Dudo, John C Besley et al.•Science Communication•2021

  • Explaining Polarized Trust in Scientists

    Open Access•Marlene Altenmüller, Tobias Wingen et al.•Science Communication•2024

  • Identifying Relevant Anti-Science Perceptions to Improve Science-Based Communication

    Open Access•Melanie Morgan, William B Collins et al.•Social Sciences•2018

  • Open Science and the Science-Society Relationship

    Open Access•Martin Lakomý, Renata Hlavová et al.•Society•2019

  • A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Muhammad Naeem, Wilson Ozuem et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • From Data Management to Actionable Findings

    Open Access•Andrea J Bingham•International Journal of…•2023

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Lorelli Nowell, Jill M Norris et al.•International Journal of…•2017

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae