Fighting Fakes on WhatsApp—Audience Perspectives on Fact Bots as Countermeasures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22010653 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lena Frischlich (0000-0001-5039-5301, University of Southern Denmark, corresponding author), Johanna Klapproth (0009-0009-0912-7036, University of Münster), Sara Frank (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Mara Heckmann (0000-0002-0114-8184, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Susanne Elizabeth Kunze (Department of Communication, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany), Susanne Kunze (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Thalía Murgas (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 700-720 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Digital Journalism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2167-0811 • E-ISSN: 2167-082X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21670811.2024.2341299 |
| OpenAlex | W4398236450 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 70 |
The messengerization of society and the rise of meso-communication spaces have created new opportunity structures for spreading misinformation. Countermeasures in this context must meet other privacy standards than, for instance, journalist fact-checking or community management on more public social media spaces. In this article, we are specifically interested in audience perspectives on fact-check delivering bots to counter misinformation thriving in meso spaces on instant messengers. Despite initial journalistic projects, there is scarce knowledge of audience perspectives on such fact bots in private and meso-spaces. The current study sought to fill this gap and describe the themes and beliefs characterizing instant messenger users’ considerations of fact bots. To this end, we conducted explorative qualitative interviews (N = 18) with a heterogeneous group of German instant messenger users. We identified four central themes in interviewees’ considerations of employing fact bots: questionable advantages in terms of ease, perceived usefulness for educating others, perceived injunctive norms between safety and privacy, and distrust towards information curators. We describe these themes using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Overall, our study provides meaningful starting points for further research and practitioners fighting misinformation in the messengerized society with its increased digital meso spaces
Business · Internet privacy · Media studies · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · World Wide Web · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Spam and Phishing Detection
Debunking
The Personal Is the Political? What Do WhatsApp Users Share and How It Matters for News Knowledge, Polarization and Participation in Chile
Need fulfillment and experiences on social media
Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift.
How Do They Debunk “Fake News”? A Cross-National Comparison of Transparency in Fact Checks
The Dunning–Kruger Effect
News Bots
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
Nature and Operation of Attitudes
Considering Interinstitutional Visibilities in Combating Misinformation
Characterizing Communication Patterns between Audiences and Newsbots
The Meso News-Space
The Watchdog Role of Fact-Checkers in Different Media Systems
Distribution and Reception of Conspiracy Theories and Mobilization Calls on Telegram. Combining Evidence from a Content Analysis and Survey During the Pandemic
WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism
Antecedents of support for social media content moderation and platform regulation
Fake news and its electoral consequences
A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior
Third person effects of fake news
The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research
Research note
Technology acceptance and transparency demands for toxic language classification – interviews with moderators of public online discussion fora
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Why National Media Systems Matter
Domesticating WhatsApp
Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media
Desinformación en las elecciones presidenciales 2018 en Brasil
The perceived impact of the mass media
Actors, Actants, Audiences, and Activities in Cross-Media News Work
Diffusion of disinformation
Border patrol
Mobile witnessing on WhatsApp
A focus theory of normative conduct
Resilience to Online Disinformation
Media repertoires of selective audiences
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment
PM Me the Truth? The Conditional Effectiveness of Fact-Checks Across Social Media Sites
Changing Norms
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |