Rethinking Planning Systems

A Plea for Self-Assessment and Comparative Learning

Bibliographic Data

ID22017954
AuthorsFrank J D'Hondt (International Society for Optical Engineering), K Van Assche (0000-0003-1745-0043, University of Alberta), Barend Wind (0000-0002-7416-9592, University of Groningen), Barend Julius Wind
Year2020
Volume5
Issue1
Pages6-10
Publication date2020-03-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v5i1.2857
OpenAlexW3009728175
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited2

The authors reflect on recent experiences at UN-Habitat and other international organizations to rethink the roles of planning towards larger development goals and to reform planning systems in places most in need of them. They consider the difficulties but ultimate necessity to learn from a variety of contexts and experiences to articulate general orientations for planning and planning reform which can partly transcend context. Within the variety of planning experiences, and the experiences of lack of planning, one can discern principles which can be applied in many contexts, yet those include principles of contextualization and learning. Comparative learning underpins the attempts at finding general principles, and the local application of those principles further triggers processes of learning, including comparative learning. Local and grassroots planning capacity building is vital to locally apply and contextualize international planning guidelines

Contextualization · Engineering ethics · Geography · Grassroots · Knowledge management · Management science · Plea · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Engineering · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access