Cooking, Caring, and Commoning

Grassroots Community Kitchens Across Five European Cities

Bibliographic Data

ID22018299
AuthorsSandi Abram (0000-0002-8257-4352, University of Ljubljana), Franz Bernhardt (0000-0002-4254-0385, Aalborg University), Natascha Flückiger (0009-0001-3816-0806, University of Bern), Joana Lilli Hofstetter (0000-0001-5690-6221, University of Freiburg), Mouna Maaroufi (0000-0002-2111-896X, Universität Hamburg)
Year2025
Volume10
Publication date2025-09-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.10145
OpenAlexW4414274471
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited33

In this article, we analyse collective cooking initiatives in Florence, Copenhagen, Ljubljana, Berlin, and Bern, illuminating how they foster care and commons amidst multiple urban crises. From our ethnographic explorations, these community kitchens emerge as forms of resistance against current urban conditions characterised by displacement, “care‐lessness,” precarisation, and individualisation. These five kitchen initiatives exemplify countermeasures to such developments, where acts of communal cooking and eating nurture a sense of commonality and collective power. Within them, acts of cooking and eating transcend the private sphere of reproductive work and become foundations for community engagement, offering insights into radical collective care and autonomous social infrastructures. These kitchens operate within a variety of contexts—ranging from a public park, a squat, a housing project, to a refugee and social centre—and are not easily identifiable as either private or public. Instead, they address a variety of concerns in specific socio‐spatial settings and attend to individual and collective needs. Thereby, the collective care for people and spaces extends into what we conceptualise as “direct care for the urban space.” Although the diverse and complex initiatives face challenges from external socio‐political conditions and internal ambivalences and conflicts, their experimentations remain essential; not only to prefigure futures built on collective relations and common infrastructures of care, but also because they convey a sense of belonging, mutual aid, and collective care in the here and now

Care work · Commons · Ethnography · Futures contract · Grassroots · Nature versus nurture · Homelessness and Social Issues · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access