Googling the City
In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22018351 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kevin Morgan (0000-0002-2933-2231, Cardiff University), Brian Webb (0000-0001-9247-960X, Cardiff University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 84-95 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.v5i1.2520 |
| OpenAlex | W3010808776 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 40 |
Toronto’s Quayside waterfront regeneration project has become an international reference point for the burgeoning debate about the scope and limits of the digitally enabled ‘smart city’ narrative. The project signals the entry of a Google affiliate into the realm of ‘smart urbanism’ in the most dramatic fashion imaginable, by allowing them to potentially realise their long-running dream for “someone to give us a city and put us in charge.” This article aims to understand this on-going ‘smart city’ experiment through an exploration of the ways in which ‘techno-centric’ narratives and proposed ‘disruptive’ urban innovations are being contested by the city’s civic society. To do this, the article traces the origins and evolution of the partnership between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs and identifies the key issues that have exercised local critics of the plan, including the public/private balance of power, governance, and the planning process. Despite more citizen-centric efforts, there remains a need for appropriate advocates to protect and promote the wider public interest to moderate the tensions that exist between techno-centric and citizen-centric dimensions of smart cities
Business · Corporate governance · General partnership · Geography · Internet of Things · Narrative · Political science · Public relations · Realm · Smart city · Sociology · Urbanism · Computer Science · Engineering · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Public Administration · Smart Cities and Technologies · Smart Parking Systems Research
Public value mapping in the smart city
Urban neoliberalism, smart city, and Big Tech
Urban Planning and the Smart City
Area-Based Urban Renewal Approach for Smart Cities Development in India
Does future community initiative improve residents’ satisfaction with their living environment? Empirical evidence from Zhejiang, China
Evaluating Collaborative Public–Private Partnerships
Public-private partnerships in smart cities
Digital planning practices
Risk and Approaches to Risk-Taking in Testbed Planning
Smart cities & citizen discontent
The prevalence of public values in public private partnerships for government digitalisation
Smart city trends
Digital trajectories in contemporary cities
Local Autonomy in Temporary Organizations
Global technology companies and the politics of urban socio-technical imaginaries in the digital age
Collaborative Planning
Splintering Urbanism
Smart city and quality of life
Urban innovation through policy integration
The Smart City as Global Discourse
Smarter than Smart
From justice in planning toward planning for justice
The Public Interest in Planning
Utilitarianism’s Bad Breath? A Re-Evaluation of the Public Interest Justification for Planning
IBM's smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility
On alternative smart cities
Smart contradictions
Privacy concerns in smart cities
Rescaling Ambitions
Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city
Smart cities
Perceptions of the common good in planning
Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation
Telecommunications, World Cities, and Urban Policy
Digital highways
"The Science of "Muddling Through
Smartmentality
Will the real smart city please stand up
Smart cities as corporate storytelling
Stopping the 'War on the Car
Smart Cities and Green Growth
Smart city as anti-planning in the UK
Theorising environmental justice
Exposing smart cities and eco-cities
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |