Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spatial Knowledge and Urban Planning

Bibliographic Data

ID22018506
AuthorsAnna Juliane Heinrich (0000-0002-9745-6244, Technische Universität Berlin), Angela Million (0000-0001-8916-1553, Technische Universität Berlin), Karsten Zimmermann (0000-0002-1023-6055, TU Dortmund University)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue3
Pages185-190
Publication date2022-08-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v7i3.6101
OpenAlexW4293231039
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited27

Urban planning is simultaneously shaped by and creates new (spatial) knowledge. The changes in planning culture that have taken place in the last decades—especially the so-called communicative turn in planning in the 1990s—have brought about an increased attention to a growing range of stakeholders of urban development, their interests, logics, and participation in planning as well as the negotiation processes between these stakeholders. However, while this has also been researched in breadth and depth, only scant attention has been paid to the knowledge (claims) of these stakeholders. In planning practice, knowledge, implicit and explicit, has been a highly relevant topic for quite some time: It is discussed how local knowledge can inform urban planning, how experimental knowledge on urban development can be generated in living labs, and what infrastructures can process “big data” and make it usable for planning, to name a few examples. With the thematic issue on “Spatial Knowledge and Urban Planning” we invited articles aiming at exploring the diverse understandings of (spatial) knowledge, and how knowledge influences planning and how planning itself constitutes processes of knowledge generation. The editorial gives a brief introduction to the general topic. Subsequently, abstracts of all articles illustrate what contents the issue has to offer and the specific contribution of each text is carved out. In the conclusion, common and recurring themes as well as remaining gaps and open questions at the interface of spatial knowledge and urban planning are discussed

Cartography · Environmental design and planning · Environmental planning · Geography · Knowledge management · Land use · Land-use planning · Negotiation · Social science · Sociology · Spatial planning · Thematic map · Urban planning · USable · Computer Science · Engineering · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Rural development and sustainability

  • A research agenda for studying evidence-informed practice in urban planning

    Open Access•Du Toit, Amy Pieterse•Planning Practice and Research•2026

  • Between innovative ambitions and erratic everyday practices

    Anne Kuppler, C Fricke•Town Planning Review•2025

  • Learning the City

    Open Access•Colin Mcfarlane•Learning the City•2011

  • Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference

    Watson, Vanessa Watson•Planning Theory & Practice•2014

  • Rethinking the science-policy nexus

    Open Access•Ruth Hoppe, Robert Hoppe•Poiesis•2005

  • The reflective practitioner

    Donald A Schon•The reflective practitioner•1991

  • Transforming Spatial Practices Through Knowledges on the Margins

    Open Access•Zuzana Tabackova•Urban Planning•2022

  • Mobilising Situated Local Knowledge for Participatory Urban Planning Through Storytelling

    Open Access•Hanna Seydel, Sandra Huning•Urban Planning•2022

  • Sharing and Space-Commoning Knowledge Through Urban Living Labs Across Different European Cities

    Open Access•Doina Petrescu, Helena Cermeño et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • Rendering Affective Atmospheres

    Open Access•Sophie Mélix, Gabriela B Christmann•Urban Planning•2022

  • “Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality

    Open Access•Stephanie Butcher, Camila Cociña et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • The Scaling Potential of Experimental Knowledge in the Case of the Bauhaus.MobilityLab, Erfurt (Germany)

    Open Access•Luise Kraaz, Mária Kopp et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • Copenhagen’s Struggle to Become the World’s First Carbon Neutral Capital

    Open Access•Ulrik Kohl, John Andersen•Urban Planning•2022

  • “Dalston! Who Asked U?”

    Open Access•Carsten Jungfer, Fernanda Palmieri et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • Evidence-Based Planning

    Open Access•Thiago Corrêa Jacovine, Kaio Nogueira et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • Soziale Bewegung

    Open Access•Susanne Maurer•Handbuch Sozialraum•2019

  • The epistemologies of local climate change policies in Germany

    Open Access•Karsten Zimmermann, Jasmin Boghrat et al.•Urban Research & Practice•2015

  • Being Alive

    T Ingold•Being Alive•2011

  • Unsettling planning theory

    Open Access•Janice Barry, Janis Barry et al.•Planning Theory•2018

  • Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory

    Open Access•Yvonne Rydin•Planning Theory•2007

  • Embedded expertise

    Arlena Jung, Rebecca-Lea Korinek et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2014

  • Planning to Change the World

    Open Access•Heather Campbell•Journal of Planning Education and…•2012

  • Planning through debate

    Patsy Healey•Town Planning Review•1992

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae