Spatial Knowledge and Urban Planning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22018506 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Juliane Heinrich (0000-0002-9745-6244, Technische Universität Berlin), Angela Million (0000-0001-8916-1553, Technische Universität Berlin), Karsten Zimmermann (0000-0002-1023-6055, TU Dortmund University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 185-190 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/up.v7i3.6101 |
| OpenAlex | W4293231039 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
Urban planning is simultaneously shaped by and creates new (spatial) knowledge. The changes in planning culture that have taken place in the last decades—especially the so-called communicative turn in planning in the 1990s—have brought about an increased attention to a growing range of stakeholders of urban development, their interests, logics, and participation in planning as well as the negotiation processes between these stakeholders. However, while this has also been researched in breadth and depth, only scant attention has been paid to the knowledge (claims) of these stakeholders. In planning practice, knowledge, implicit and explicit, has been a highly relevant topic for quite some time: It is discussed how local knowledge can inform urban planning, how experimental knowledge on urban development can be generated in living labs, and what infrastructures can process “big data” and make it usable for planning, to name a few examples. With the thematic issue on “Spatial Knowledge and Urban Planning” we invited articles aiming at exploring the diverse understandings of (spatial) knowledge, and how knowledge influences planning and how planning itself constitutes processes of knowledge generation. The editorial gives a brief introduction to the general topic. Subsequently, abstracts of all articles illustrate what contents the issue has to offer and the specific contribution of each text is carved out. In the conclusion, common and recurring themes as well as remaining gaps and open questions at the interface of spatial knowledge and urban planning are discussed
Cartography · Environmental design and planning · Environmental planning · Geography · Knowledge management · Land use · Land-use planning · Negotiation · Social science · Sociology · Spatial planning · Thematic map · Urban planning · USable · Computer Science · Engineering · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Rural development and sustainability
Learning the City
Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference
Rethinking the science-policy nexus
The reflective practitioner
Transforming Spatial Practices Through Knowledges on the Margins
Mobilising Situated Local Knowledge for Participatory Urban Planning Through Storytelling
Sharing and Space-Commoning Knowledge Through Urban Living Labs Across Different European Cities
Rendering Affective Atmospheres
“Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality
The Scaling Potential of Experimental Knowledge in the Case of the Bauhaus.MobilityLab, Erfurt (Germany)
Copenhagen’s Struggle to Become the World’s First Carbon Neutral Capital
“Dalston! Who Asked U?”
Evidence-Based Planning
Soziale Bewegung
The epistemologies of local climate change policies in Germany
Being Alive
Unsettling planning theory
Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory
Embedded expertise
Planning to Change the World
Planning through debate
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |