Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Transforming Spatial Practices Through Knowledges on the Margins

Bibliographic Data

ID22018592
AuthorsZuzana Tabackova (Technische Universität Berlin, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue3
Publication date2022-08-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v7i3.5415
OpenAlexW4291018596
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

Drawing on knowledges of spatial practitioners in Slovakia and Czechia, as well as those of feminist science and technology studies and actor-network theory, the article explores the benefits and importance of bringing diverse knowledges into spatial practice. More specifically, it focuses on the issue of including voices, perspectives, and knowledges in the construction of space other than those of status quo often implicated in the (re)production of social injustices. It proposes to look at the margins as a site of potential resistance to find spatial practices/know-hows and visions that actually contribute to the creation of spaces for good lives of marginalised communities. Leaning on the experiences of practitioners on the margins, the article presents portraits of two organisations to explore in detail what spatial practices they employ to materialise their marginalised visions. Building on an analysis of these case studies, the article closes with a description of three transformations of spatial practice that are needed for better involvement of marginalised visions in spatial production: addressing a more complete image of the world, conceiving of space as multiple becoming, and participation as a matter of care

Environmental ethics · Political science · Sociology · Status quo · Vision · Anthropology · Computer Science · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Rural development and sustainability

  • Making ‘good’ spaces for the 99% – feminist spatial practices in Slovakia and Czechia

    Open Access•Zuzana Tabackova, Lýdia Grešáková•Feminist Encounters A Journal of…•2026

  • Spatial Knowledge and Urban Planning

    Open Access•Anna Juliane Heinrich, Angela Million et al.•Urban Planning•2022

  • Extending Kinship

    María De La Luz Ibarra, Nilda Flores•Immigrant Women Workers In The…•2017

  • Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning

    Paul Davidoff•Journal of the American Institute…•1965

  • Handbook of Urban Segregation

    Maloutas Thomas, Sako Musterd•Handbook of Urban Segregation•2020

  • Objectivity and Diversity

    Sandra Harding•Objectivity and Diversity•2015

  • Take Back the Economy

    K Gibson, J K Gibson-Graham et al.•Take Back the Economy•2010

  • Anarchy in the UK

    J Kawalerowicz, Michael Biggs•Social Forces•2015

  • Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory

    Open Access•Yvonne Rydin•Planning Theory•2007

  • Planning as practice of knowing

    Open Access•Simin Davoudi•Planning Theory•2015

  • Insurgent Planning

    Open Access•Faranak Miraftab•Planning Theory•2009

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae