Rethinking nuclear verification through the Global South
Latin American approaches
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22020109 |
|---|---|
| Authors | João Paulo Nicolini Gabriel (0000-0002-4239-3522, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), Ana Sánchez Cobaleda (0000-0002-1452-9146, Universitat de Barcelona, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2192-1741 • E-ISSN: 2524-6976 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s42597-026-00162-z |
| OpenAlex | W7166723771 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
In an era of heightened geopolitical rivalries among major nuclear powers, verification regimes for nuclear nonproliferation, arms control, and disarmament face increasing strain. This paper argues that integrating Global South perspectives is essential for creating more effective and inclusive verification mechanisms. Using a postcolonial lens, it highlights how Southern actors have contributed innovative practices that challenge systemic inequities in nuclear governance and propose alternative security models. Focusing on Latin America, the paper examines two key cases. First, the Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials (ABACC) illustrates how regional cooperation and technical collaboration can foster trust and ensure robust safeguards transcending historical tensions. As a bilateral initiative, ABACC exemplifies the potential of autonomous, Global South–driven verification frameworks to reshape traditional North-dominated approaches. Second, the Treaty of Tlatelolco and its implementing body, OPANAL, established the world’s first nuclear-weapon-free zone in a populated region. This pioneering regional effort underscored the Global South’s commitment to multilateralism and collective verification tailored to local contexts. These case studies demonstrate how Latin American experiences offer valuable lessons for strengthening verification regimes globally. The region’s emphasis on shared accountability, institutional innovation, and regional ownership provides a model for adapting verification frameworks to today’s multipolar world. Ultimately, this qualitative study underscores the importance of moving beyond traditional, Northern-centric approaches to nuclear verification. By foregrounding the practices and agency of Latin American actors, it advocates for a more equitable and resilient global verification regime that promotes trust, cooperation, and decolonial approaches to nuclear governance
Corporate governance · Disarmament · Geopolitics · Latin Americans · Multilateralism · Treaty · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Nuclear Issues and Defense
After Defeat
América Latina y sus aportes al régimen de no-proliferación nuclear
Bananas, Beaches and Bases
De-westernization, democratization, disconnection
The diplomacy of resistance
Nuclear weapons and the humanitarian approach
Between Discipline and Dissent
Behind the veil of good intentions
NPT as an antifragile system
A hegemonic nuclear order
Tlatelolco Treaty
Nuclear weapons and interstate conflict behavior
Arms Control Lessons from Latin America
Nuclear weapon-free zones and the issue of maritime transit in Latin America
Challenging war traditions
Examining ‘gender-sensitive’ approaches to nuclear weapons policy
Nuclear Deviance
War and International Politics
Brazilian failures to consolidate a domestic nuclear industry
The struggle for influence by emerging powers in nuclear global governance
(Re-)ordering from the periphery
The Ideology of Nuclear Order
Gender and the Nuclear Weapons State
Maintaining a nonproliferation regime
The Tlatelolco regime and nonproliferation in Latin America
Postcolonial perspectives on weapons control
Alfonso García Robles y el Tratado de Tlatelolco
Sly civility and the paradox of equality/inequality in the nuclear order
Negotiating Global Nuclearities
A contestation of nuclear ontologies
No such thing as a free donation? Research funding and conflicts of interest in nuclear weapons policy analysis
Rethinking global nuclear politics, rethinking feminism
The false promise of nuclear risk reduction
Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |