Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Memorability and Cognitive Errors in Recognizing Graffiti in Urban Environments

Results from a Field Experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID22039634
AuthorsOlga V Kruzhkova (0000-0002-2569-8789, Ural State Pedagogical University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume14
Issue2
Pages163-180
Publication date2025-03-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNauchnyi Dialog (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2225-756X • E-ISSN: 2227-1295
PublisherOOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-2-163-180
OpenAlexW4409001193
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

The authors of vandalistic alterations to urban environments aim to make their works noticeable to the maximum number of observers in order to draw attention to their statements. However, from the perspective of the “inadvertent observer,” the visibility of unauthorized graffiti as elements of the urban landscape and their cognitive impact are not immediately evident. The objective of this study is to examine the perception of graffiti in the form of images and vandalized texts, focusing on their recognition and memorization by “inadvertent observers” in natural urban settings during a walking route. Participants in the field experiment (29 individuals aged 14 to 59) were asked to walk along a pedestrian route in the city center of Yekaterinburg. The direction of participants’ gaze was tracked using mobile eyetracking glasses. After completing the route, respondents selected unauthorized graffiti (both images and texts) encountered along the way from a set of alternatives presented in a questionnaire. It was found that unauthorized graffiti encountered along the route were most frequently recognized by participants aged 18 to 29, with no significant differences in recognition based on gender. A preference for recognizing images over texts was identified. Familiar and comprehensible graffiti, as well as those addressing atypical (particularly religious) themes, were recognized more readily. Cognitive errors (e.g., memory attribution errors) were linked to the widespread presence of typical graffiti in urban environments

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Graffiti · Human–computer interaction · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Public Spaces through Art · Urban and sociocultural dynamics · Artificial Intelligence

  • Students’ subjective assessment of vandalism

    Open Access•Olga V Kruzhkova, Irina V Vorobyeva et al.•The Education and science journal•2026

  • A Two-Factor Model for Perception of Graffiti by Metropolis Dwellers

    Open Access•M R Babikova, Olga V Kruzhkova•Nauchnyi Dialog•2025

  • Vandalized Texts

    Open Access•Olga V Kruzhkova, M R Babikova et al.•Nauchnyi Dialog•2024

  • Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti

    Open Access•M R Babikova•Nauchnyi Dialog•2024

  • Graffiti Writers Choose Locations That Optimize Exposure

    Open Access•K Kuralarasan, Wim Bernasco et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2026

  • Place-Based Elicitation

    Open Access•Bloch, Stefano Bloch•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2018

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae