Proficiency-Calibrated AI-Generated Reading Input in EFL
A Cefr-Aligned Comparison of Extensive- and Intensive-Oriented Pathways
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22044065 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Latifah Hamdan Alghamdi (0009-0001-4443-5220, King Khalid University, corresponding author), Talal Musaed Alghizzi (0000-0002-1088-9216, Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1068 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16071068 |
| OpenAlex | W7167280639 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 41 |
Artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities to generate instructional materials calibrated to learners’ proficiency levels; however, evidence on its use in extensive and intensive reading instruction remains limited. This mixed-methods quasi-experimental study examined the association between CEFR-calibrated AI-generated reading texts and EFL learners’ reading comprehension and attitudes. A total of 171 Saudi undergraduate EFL learners participated in a 13-week intervention and were assigned to one of three instructional conditions: Intensive Reading using C1-level texts (G1, n = 55), Extensive Reading using B2-level texts (G2, n = 58), or Extensive Reading using A2-level texts (G3, n = 58). AI-generated reading materials were independently validated using Text Inspector and the Pearson GSE Toolkit before implementation. Reading comprehension was assessed using common pre- and post-tests, and learner perceptions were measured using a post-intervention questionnaire. All three instructional conditions were associated with statistically significant improvements in reading comprehension over the intervention period. Among the three groups, the B2 Extensive Reading condition achieved the highest post-test reading comprehension scores, whereas the A2 Extensive Reading condition received the most favorable evaluations across the questionnaire dimensions. These findings suggest that, within the instructional configuration examined in this study, moderately challenging AI-generated texts were associated with stronger reading-comprehension outcomes, whereas less demanding texts were associated with more positive learner perceptions. The study extends current research by providing empirical evidence on the use of CEFR-calibrated AI-generated reading materials within extensive and intensive reading contexts and offers practical implications for integrating AI-supported reading instruction in EFL classrooms
Comprehension · Empirical research · Perception · Reading comprehension · Reciprocal teaching · AI in Service Interactions · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences
Questionnaires in Second Language Research
Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom
Artificial Intelligence trends in education
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language
Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1
Enhancing the reading comprehension and autonomy of foreign language students using generative AI-integrated assistant
Educators’ reflections on AI-automated feedback in higher education
Using AI to adapt reading input for mixed-proficiency EFL learners
Extensive reading in English as a foreign language
Extensive reading and development of different aspects of L2 proficiency
Facilitating ESL Reading by Teaching Text Structure
A Meta-Analysis of Extensive Reading Research
The Effects of Extensive Reading on Reading Comprehension, Reading Rate, and Vocabulary Acquisition
Integrating synergistic learning and ability grouping with AI-generated multi-tiered tasks to enhance reading attitudes and outcomes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |