Generative Artificial Intelligence Amplifies the Role of Critical Thinking Skills and Reduces Reliance on Prior Knowledge While Promoting In-Depth Learning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22044262 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guoqing Zhao (0000-0003-3975-0151, Beijing Normal University), Haixi Sheng (0000-0003-3303-6790, Beijing Normal University), Yaxuan Wang (0000-0001-6450-0387, Beijing Normal University), Xiaohui Cai (0000-0002-3361-3335, Beijing Normal University), Taotao Long (0000-0003-1368-3229, Central China Normal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 554 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci15050554 |
| OpenAlex | W4410008514 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 51 |
This study examines how generative AI (GAI) impacts primary students’ in-depth learning, focusing on critical thinking and prior knowledge. A quasi-experiment involved 163 sixth-graders divided into three groups: a control group (lecture-based instruction) and two experimental groups using GAI as a cognitive tool (materials generation) or thinking tool (critical analysis), in which 126 participants successfully completed all the tests and were included in the analysis. ANOVA revealed the thinking-tool group and cognitive-tool group both outperformed the control group in in-depth learning, which was reflected by the knowledge transfer. Hierarchical regression showed students’ critical thinking skills and use of generative artificial intelligence significantly contributed to their in-depth learning, while prior knowledge did not. Further analysis found that significant interaction effects existed between the use of generative artificial intelligence and critical thinking skills, while no significant interaction was found between the use of generative artificial intelligence and students’ prior knowledge. In sum, critical thinking amplified GAI’s impact, while prior knowledge showed no interaction. The results suggest GAI enhances deep learning when integrated with critical thinking, reducing reliance on prior knowledge. Educators should prioritize fostering critical thinking to maximize GAI’s benefits. The findings underscore the need for pedagogical designs that balance GAI’s cognitive support with metacognitive skill development
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Critical thinking · Generative grammar · Knowledge management · Mathematics education · Metacognition · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Innovative Teaching Methods · Psychology · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes · Artificial Intelligence
ChatGPT use in higher education writing and its relationship with critical thinking autonomy struggle and authorship
Self-Evaluation in AI-Assisted Cognition
ChatGPT in education
Balancing AI-assisted learning and traditional assessment
AI-affordance alignment drives authentic learning gains without foundational erosion
Generative artificial intelligence literacy profiles and workforce readiness among pre-professional nursing students
Personalising Learning for Gifted and Twice-Exceptional Students
AI-Enhanced Teaching and Student Creative Thinking
Integrating generative artificial intelligence into secondary school programming education
Understanding Student Learning (Routledge Revivals)
The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students' learning in Ghanaian higher education
How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity?
Critical Thinking
Revolutionizing education with AI
Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning
An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load
Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text
The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies
Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Impact of AI assistance on student agency
ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students
Integrating peer assessment cycle into ChatGPT for STEM education
Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education
Integrating assessment, learning and instruction
Evaluating student engagement and deep learning in interactive online psychology learning activities
Revisiting cognitive tools from a social and motivational perspective
Re-examining cognitive tools
Information communication technology in the form of an expert system shell as a cognitive tool to facilitate higher-order thinking
Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains
On Qualitative Differences in Learning
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 9 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |