Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Embedding AI Ethics in Technical Training

A Multi-Stakeholder Pilot Module Emphasizing Co-Design and Interdisciplinary Collaboration at Rome Technopole

Bibliographic Data

ID22045932
AuthorsGiuseppe Esposito (0000-0002-7363-566X, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Massimo Sanchez (0000-0003-3696-7582, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Federica Fratini (0000-0003-0807-930X, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Egidio Iorio (0000-0001-6673-3838, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Lucia Bertuccini (0000-0002-4278-2376, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Serena Cecchetti (0000-0002-3601-176X, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Valentina Tirelli (0000-0001-6021-0833, Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Daniele Giansanti (0000-0002-8904-0847, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue10
Pages1416
Publication date2025-10-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci15101416
OpenAlexW4415402516
LanguageEN
References cited26

Higher technical education plays a strategic role in equipping the workforce to navigate rapid technological advancements and evolving labor market demands. Within the Rome Technopole framework, Spoke 4 targets ITS Academies, promoting the development of flexible, modular programs that integrate advanced technical skills with ethical, legal, and societal perspectives. This study reports on a pilot training initiative on Artificial Intelligence (AI) co-designed by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), aimed at exploring the ethical, practical, and educational relevance of AI in higher technical education. The module was developed and tested through a multi-stakeholder collaboration involving educators, institutional actors, and learners. A four-phase approach was adopted: (1) initial stakeholder consultation to identify needs and content directions, (2) collaborative design of the training module, (3) online delivery and engagement using a CAWI-based focus group, and (4) mixed-method evaluation, combining quantitative assessments and open-ended qualitative feedback. This design facilitated asynchronous participation and encouraged critical reflection on the real-world implications of AI. Through the four-phase approach, the pilot module was developed, delivered, and assessed with 37 participants. Quantitative analysis revealed high ratings for clarity, relevance, and perceived utility in terms of employability. Qualitative feedback highlighted the interdisciplinary design, the integration of ethical reasoning, and the module’s broad applicability across sectors—particularly Healthcare and Industry. Participants suggested including more real-world case studies and collaborative learning activities to enhance engagement. The findings support the feasibility and added value of embedding ethically informed, interdisciplinary AI education in professional technical training pathways. Developed within the Rome Technopole ecosystem, the pilot module offers a promising approach to fostering critical digital literacy and preparing learners for responsible engagement with emerging technologies

Curriculum · Engineering education · Focus group · Higher education · Modular design · Qualitative research · Stakeholder · Workforce · Workforce development · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

  • Responsible Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Virginia Dignum•Responsible Artificial Intelligence•2019

  • Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based design process to co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework

    Open Access•Andy Daly-Smith, Thomas Quarmby et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Open Access•Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • Educational Transformation Through Emerging Technologies

    Open Access•Andrés F Mena-Guacas, Luis López-Catalán et al.•Education Sciences•2025

  • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development

    Open Access•Aniella Mihaela Vieriu, Gabriel Petrea•Education Sciences•2025

  • Co-constructing educational innovations for an uncertain future

    Open Access•Elizabeth Kurucz, Emily Krysten Spencer-Mueller et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2025

  • The ethics of AI in health care

    Open Access•Jessica Morley, Caio C Vieira Machado et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • The ethics of algorithms

    Open Access•Brent Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel Mittelstadt et al.•Big Data & Society•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae