Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Preferences and Scores of Different Types of Exams during Covid-19 Pandemic in Faculty of Veterinary Medicine in Spain

A Cross-Sectional Study of Paper and E-exams

Bibliographic Data

ID22046238
AuthorsP J Marín-García (0000-0001-9593-3476, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU), Alberto Arnau-Bonachera (0000-0002-0872-3575, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU), Lola Llobat (0000-0002-9806-9174, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume11
Issue8
Pages386
Publication date2021-07-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci11080386
OpenAlexW3186500576
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited15

The World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic on 11 March 2020, and educational institutions have had to modify most of their activities (face-to-face activities were suspended). This situation forced academic institutions to modify the evaluation format of students. The use of proctoring systems quickly became widespread, although some controversies arose. The two main discussions regarding these systems are the integrity of the assessment and the capacity of the students to adapt to this new assessment method, without changes in theirs scores. To elucidate two controversies, we have analyzed the preferences and the scores obtained from a trial of 660 scores from 332 students of the third grade of Veterinary Medicine. The experiment involved three modalities of exam: an online format from home using the Respondus Lockdown Browser system (Modality 1), online in person using the Respondus Lockdown Browser system with the supervision of a teacher (Modality 2), or paper format in person with the supervision of a teacher (Modality 3). The results obtained showed that the students preferred Modality 1 (online at home with Respondus Lockdown Browser system). No statistical differences between the scores obtained by students were found between the three modalities analyzed. The proctoring system is a good method to adjudicate exams in higher education institutions, and the scores of students are similar to those obtained through traditional evaluation and control systems

Medical education · Modalities · Pandemic · Pathology · Sociology · Computer Science · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Innovative Teaching Methods · Medicine · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology

  • The integrity of online examinations in Undergraduate Programmes

    Open Access•Anele Mabovana, Tshepo Rabotapi•E-Journal of Humanities Arts and…•2026

  • Use of Alternative Methodologies in Veterinary Medicine Learning and Acceptance of Students

    Open Access•P J Marín-García, Lola Llobat•Education Sciences•2022

  • Revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre las tecnologías de e-proctoring para la supervisión de exámenes en educación superior

    Open Access•Cecilia Esperanza Flores Zavaleta•Perfiles Educativos•2024

  • Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19)

    W Joost Wiersinga, Andrew Rhodes et al.•JAMA•2020

  • Development and Validation of an Attitude Scale towards Online Teaching and Learning for Higher Education Teachers

    Open Access•Anupma Sangwan, Anurag Sangwan et al.•TechTrends•2020

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae