Bioscience Students in Physics Courses with Higher Test Anxiety Have Lower Grades on High-Stakes Assessments and Women Report More Test Anxiety than Men

Bibliographic Data

ID22046886
AuthorsAlysa Malespina (0000-0002-8384-4772, University of Pittsburgh), Fargol Seifollahi (0009-0003-3092-7763, University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Chandralekha Singh (0000-0002-1234-5458, University of Pittsburgh)
Year2024
Volume14
Issue10
Pages1092
Publication date2024-10-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducation Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/educsci14101092
OpenAlexW4403229479
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited49

Test anxiety is beginning to be recognized as a significant factor affecting student performance in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses, potentially contributing to gender inequity within these fields. Additionally, the management of test anxiety can improve self-efficacy, which is a construct that has been well studied in the physics context. In this study, we investigated the relationship between self-efficacy, test anxiety, and gender differences in performance in a two-semester-long introductory physics course sequence for bioscience students in which women outnumber men. Using validated survey data and grade information from students in a two-semester introductory physics course sequence, we compared the predictive power of self-efficacy and test anxiety on female and male students’ performance on both low- and high-stakes assessments. We found that there were gender differences disadvantaging women in self-efficacy and test anxiety in both Physics 1 and Physics 2, as well as gender differences in high-stakes outcomes in Physics 1. There were no gender differences in low-stakes assessment scores. We also found that self-efficacy and test anxiety predicted high-stakes (but not low-stakes) assessment outcomes in both Physics 1 and Physics 2. Comparison of these findings with prior studies involving physical science and engineering students shows that although women outnumber men in physics courses for bioscience students and the career goals of bioscience students are very different from the earlier researched group, most of the negative trends hold even for this new population. Thus, these findings, in a new context involving bioscience students in physics courses, are very important because they reinforce the systemic nature of women being affected more adversely by anxiety in high-stakes assessments, which is a threat to creating equitable and inclusive learning environments. An important implication is that course instructors should carefully consider how high-stakes and low-stakes assessments are used to determine grades and how to create an overall equitable, inclusive, and low-anxiety learning environment

Anxiety · Mathematics education · Medical education · Psychiatry · Test anxiety · Test preparation · Career Development and Diversity · Clinical Psychology · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Engineering · Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation · Medicine · Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access